a Punished Toxicology appreciate thread

[Kidalex90]

Kidalex90, you put a bunch of screenshots in your signature to demonstrate your "bad boy status", showing bans and people getting upset with you. Do you really believe you have any ground to stand on when discussion who is or isn't ban-worthy, when you can't even seem to understand the rules for yourself?

we all know that youre smashing your head on your desk right now because of this thread and your crippling debt

[Ad Bot]

[torin²]

Enjoy the safe space fellow liberal :)

my furry free safe space

[IkeTheGeneric]

he was banned because he insulted mcjob which by your logic he shouldnt have been banned for
i am very sorrowful that youre illiterate and probably suffer from numerous cognitive disabilities

You can use critical thinking to discern the difference between being insulting and 'flaming', since I happened to put that really big word "Unprovoked" a couple times to describe flaming. Based on the precedence for the rule, it seems Badspot's definition for flaming is unprovoked personal attacks, or anything of the sort.

[gr8dayseth]

really makes you think, with the same 2-3 people getting banned and then buying accounts to keep doing what they got banned for

indeed

[Trogtor]

we all know that youre smashing your head on your desk right now because of this thread and your crippling debt

lol pwn complete

[IkeTheGeneric]

we all know that youre smashing your head on your desk right now because of this thread and your crippling debt

This is a good example of flaming

[Kidalex90]

You can use critical thinking to discern the difference between being insulting and 'flaming', since I happened to put that really big word "Unprovoked" a couple times to describe flaming. Based on the precedence for the rule, it seems Badspot's definition for flaming is unprovoked personal attacks, or anything of the sort.

except it was provoked because mcjob ip banned toxicology, and thus, dreams of cheese
also shouldnt that mean mcjob should be banned because of this post

[IkeTheGeneric]

You're acting as if I'm the one who banned toxicology, I'm just trying to my best to explain why.

Something something don't kill the messenger.

[beachbum111111]

You're acting as if I'm the one who banged toxicology

Fixed

[McJob]

except it was provoked because mcjob ip banned toxicology, and thus, dreams of cheese

I was not the one to apply the IP ban to Toxicology's CyTube account, and Dreams_of_cheese losing access was an unintended and unfortunate side effect that I deeply regret. However, Toxicology entered to cause trouble on a server I was hosting, and I stand by the decision of my moderators to ensure the smooth operation of the CyTube.

What happens on the CyTube has nothing to do with the forums, especially since Badspot has no frame of reference/context for that situation as it wasn't documented anywhere outside the CyTube. Toxicology didn't even explain if that was what frustrated him; again, the entire contents of his post was a one line attack focused on me. That in and of itself is uncalled for.

If Toxicology wanted me to remove the ban and promise to be on good behaviour, he should have contacted me personally. I don't buy your story, however.

[Kidalex90]

You're acting as if I'm the one who banned toxicology

what the god damn

This is a good example of flaming

also that was provoked
by your logic i shouldnt be banned

Kidalex90, you put a bunch of screenshots in your signature to demonstrate your "bad boy status", showing bans and people getting upset with you. Do you really believe you have any ground to stand on when discussing who is or isn't ban-worthy, when you can't even seem to understand the rules for yourself?

also this is unprovoked
by your logic he should be banned

[McJob]

also this is unprovoked

I am trying to demonstrate why you don't have a platform to stand on when discussing who should be banned, given the fact that you have a reputation for acting outside of the rules and giving two fingers to authority. It is perfectly within context of this thread, where you're trying to assert reasons I should be banned.

[IkeTheGeneric]

This is what's known as 'rules lawyering'

The context and precedence is there, I'm just trying to interpret it for you. You really can't twist it to argue to me about how people should have / shouldn't have been banned since it seems toxicology is currently banned, and mcjob isn't.

If you think my interpretation is wrong, then sure. But you're trying to question my logic after asking me to explain it to you since you didn't understand, so I'm wondering what your deal is here.

[Juncoph]

tfw you try to argue innocence when the judge has already given his verdict

[Maxwell.]

except it was provoked because mcjob ip banned toxicology, and thus, dreams of cheese
also shouldnt that mean mcjob should be banned because of this post

1) that was me, who had the go ahead from mcjob to do it anyway because we knew he was gonna start stuff and 2) had no idea dreams of cheese would be banned as well, because I forgot they share the same house. don't expect me to keep track of everyones personal details like your little circlejerk does

but hey, the same logic applies, and no offence to cheese, but if toxic keeps this up then I'm sure one day an IP ban will end it for both of them on here. not that I even want that to happen because I consider dreams a friend, and have personally vouched for him to be unbanned at one point after a mistake on the forums part, so I don't think he'll be happy at his brother for causing that either

the point is mcjob won't be banned through association here either purposefully or accidentally, the same way I didn't mean to ban dreams of cheese via association here because it'd be stupid since he's not the one being a prick and I already apologised to him, I just wanted to watch the movie in peace, but you handicaps had to barge in and try to ruin it. good thing it backfired so hard that you got exactly what was coming to you, and mcjob defended himself, so logically the only flaming is from toxic's side- again, everyone but you knows this so I know for a fact you're just in this half butthurt half ironic state of disarray over the drama you caused, because you're loving useless at handling yourself

I figured I should at least clear this up on mcjob and cheese's part, otherwise you're hardly worth the effort to even respond to. you're 13 and already in with the most toxic people on this forum but I honestly don't give two stuffs at this point if you ruin your reputation or whatever in this community