Author Topic: Charlottesville protests thread  (Read 91232 times)

So victim blaming is fine as long as you disagree with the person, is what you handicaps are saying
Where did I say I agreed with the attacks on the male in the video? I don't, by the way. Violence/assault is wrong in any form unless it is justifiable as an act of self defense of course.

Literally one extra letter in your sentence and you sound exactly like the type of person you're arguing against.
The difference between the two examples is that due to the current hectic state of politics, the male should have seen it coming, while as a rape or loveual assault victim should not have to see it coming. If you're walking into a liberal gathering or whatever as a conservative dressed like that you should expect harassment in some form. (again, not saying said harassment is okay at all). Someone going out dressed in whatever minding their own business in a normal social environment most likely isn't expecting rape. I mean after you and matthew explained your reasoning for the brown townogy I can understand to some degree why it was used however I just think a better example could have been used.

blah dee blah bladheu bhue


If I could think of a better brown townogy I would use that but's the first thing that came to mind; I understand the aversion to it, it was just the most concise way for me to draw the comparison


especially such a stuffty foundation like the YAF.

you can't call any group stuffty when you support the ira

i'm wondering, is this whole thing with Annoying Orange not condemning white supremacists and instead blaming both sides and then attacking someone that left the work union pretty much signaling the fall of Annoying Orange?

correct me if im wrong but i dont think obama said anything about the black lives matter riots either

i'm wondering, is this whole thing with Annoying Orange not condemning white supremacists and instead blaming both sides and then attacking someone that left the work union pretty much signaling the fall of Annoying Orange?

no

i'm wondering, is this whole thing with Annoying Orange not condemning white supremacists and instead blaming both sides and then attacking someone that left the work union pretty much signaling the fall of Annoying Orange?
THIS IS IT HIS CAMPAIGN IS FINISHED



aw hell yeah more unfunny fake ads

nvm i got bamboozeled


i'm wondering, is this whole thing with Annoying Orange not condemning white supremacists and instead blaming both sides and then attacking someone that left the work union pretty much signaling the fall of Annoying Orange?
IMPEACHMENT ANYDAY NOW

you have to look in awe at the media when they tear apart Annoying Orange for "failing to condemn the national socialists" (even though he technically did it) and calling out the violence on both sides (which did happen), meanwhile some BLM nut kills several cops with a loving sniper rifle and Obama doesn't call out BLM and the media supports him

I'm not particularly fond of Annoying Orange's response to this either (I would have preferred if he called out each group by name, white supremacists, national socialists, antifa and communists) but to flood every crevice of the coverage of this event with denial of any wrongdoing by the left is to actively contribute to this stuff