are you seriously comparing americans revolting against the crown to red anarchists destroying a historical monument?
well.... yeah? I mean, what's the diff, exactly? if it'd turned out that britain won you can rest assured the tea party would be seen exactly how you're looking at this event now
and if a couple hundred years from now it happens that the stuff going on now was a historical turning point then, I imagine this event or events like it would be seen similarly to the boston tea party
not to say that vandalism is justified (it's hard to even say that the tea party was justified... it was literally about taxes), but I'm not sure I understand what the difference is that you're seeing between the two acts of vandalism