Author Topic: anitfa might be considered as terrorists now  (Read 21933 times)

I mean I don't see the existential threat besides breaking windows n stuff.

the exact same thing could be said for neo-national socialists. none of these groups will hold any power because most people find them disgusting. so that leaves us with what they do. they do the same exact things, except one is far right and one is far left

apparently to Leisure chanting words is much worse than breaking windows and other stuff

Did we already forget about the 1 person dead and 19 people injured in Charlottesville

the exact same thing could be said for neo-national socialists. none of these groups will hold any power because most people find them disgusting. so that leaves us with what they do. they do the same exact things, except one is far right and one is far left

Fascism has some power in America, whether it be upfront or in-disguise. The president of a Philly police union referred to black activists as rabid animals and yet gives the a-OK on an officer having a national socialist tattoo.

Badspot

  • Administrator
That wasn't my argument. Saying capitalism kills 20 million people per year is probably frivolous, but so is the estimate of 100 million people across all time killed by communism. Both are statistics made by extremely careless historians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Leap_Forward
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purges_of_the_Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union

The most conservative estimates possible are going to be in the 20+ million range without even going into wars or estimating DPRK famines/purges, or counting the exploits national socialist german workers party.


And again, the true answers lie in the ideologies of these two groups.  Anti-fascism is fighting against genocide and tyranny; fascism is fighting for those things. And holding open rallies for fascism is essentially declaring violence. That people would try and equate these two groups as equally bad or making the former worse is ignorant.

You're defining the world as either with you or against you, then you're defining everyone against you as the sole perpetrators of violence.  This is the most dishonest stuff I've ever seen. 

The world is not divided into fascists and communists.  They're two sides of the same coin and most people are against both. 


Fascism has some power in America, whether it be upfront or in-disguise. The president of a Philly police union referred to black activists as rabid animals and yet gives the a-OK on an officer having a national socialist tattoo.

i mean blm is basically a pack of wild animals so i don't see a problem with that but if you're seriously suggesting we might have complete fascist control at some point you're completely insane

You're defining the world as either with you or against you, then you're defining everyone against you as the sole perpetrators of violence.  This is the most dishonest stuff I've ever seen.  

The world is not divided into fascists and communists.  They're two sides of the same coin and most people are against both.  

The path we are going down, the world will be divided into fascists and socialists. We're starting to see the collapse of legitimacy in liberal institutions. That's how we got Annoying Orange. There's going to more ecological and economic disasters in the future that the center is unable to deal with, and then the choice will be mass redistributions of the ill-gotten gains of the first world, or genocide. We're already seeing people on the right, including libertarians, who are saying that if that's the choice, they'll choose genocide. And they're getting people ready intellectually and emotionally for when the time comes to make that choice why it's OK if that happens, and how they're not really people. That's why we push for our walls, our drones, our bombs and our guns to keep them away and watch them die with clear consciousness. On the other side, the left is making the argument that that shouldn't be our future, and we have the resources to save billions of people regardless of who they are and give them a decent worthwhile existence.

So we can talk all we want about how both fascism and communism are two sides of the same coin and all that now, but at a certain point it's either gonna be egalitarianism or genocide. That's why all this talk about the "free speech" of fascists is complete hubris, because all the benefits of our liberal institutions like our civil rights will go away if they ever had their hands on power.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2017, 12:37:35 AM by LeisureSuit912 »

The path we are going down, the world will be divided into fascists and socialists.

this is such a loving tin hat sentence lol

Holy stuff leisure suit at least TRY to conceal your autism.

this is such a loving tin hat sentence lol

It's more realistic than Soros, cultural Marxism, Pizzagate or whatever bullstuff the right comes up with

It's more realistic than Soros, cultural Marxism, Pizzagate or whatever bullstuff the right comes up with

I think most of that can be boiled off to stuffposting/jokes, you actually believe what you're saying right now

It's more realistic than Soros, cultural Marxism, Pizzagate or whatever bullstuff the right comes up with

no they're both as crazy you loving tard

That's why all this talk about the "free speech" of fascists is complete hubris, because all the benefits of our liberal institutions like our civil rights will go away if they ever had their hands on power.

...you really don't know what you're talking about with this sentence, do you?

...you really don't know what you're talking about with this sentence, do you?

i don't think he gets that nobody likes national socialists and commies, probably because for the past 100 years we've seen how stuffty national socialists and commies are. according to him we're one vote away from turning into a dictatorship run by Blue Meanie's richard hair

I think most of that can be boiled off to stuffposting/jokes, you actually believe what you're saying right now

Because it truly will be socialism or barbarism. Think about how climate change and global warming affects our society. How the forget won't that affect who gets what and how resources are divided among the populace?

Climate change will negatively harm human health, agriculture and food security, water supply, transportation, energy and ecosystems. All of those issues are inherently political because it's about who gets what.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2017, 12:43:47 AM by LeisureSuit912 »

Because it truly will be socialism or barbarism.

holy stuff you just don't stop do you