Author Topic: Las Vegas Police Investigating Shooting at Mandalay Bay Casino  (Read 44218 times)

aren't most gun deaths gang related

aren't most gun deaths gang related
if thats true then thats why liberals wanna ban guns, they blame deaths on gangs
hmmmm

if thats true then thats why liberals wanna ban guns, they blame deaths on gangs
hmmmm

what

why would this not work in the US? how is taking military contracts and making some shotguns and hunting rifles on the side for civilian purchase after a safety test and mental evaluation not sufficient?
Well, let's talk about fully auto weapons

Fully auto weapons, and parts used to convert semi-autos to fully-autos, manufactured after....sometime in 1986, I forget the exact date....are outright banned for civilian trade. So...that parts already been done.

Now, sure, we still have existing stock manufactured before the previously mentioned date. You can freely trade (with the right permits, federal registration, and taxes) but with zero input of new supply, the market-value for a civilian-ownable, fully automatic, legal firearm has risen to ~$20-30k, where a semi-auto model could be had for <$1k. How do you remove this stock from the market? Do you just tell everyone "we're taking several tens of thousands of dollars of stuff from you, tough stuff, you get nothing" ? I can't see any case how I would support something like that. Does the government pay everyone 20-30k a pop for their existing full auto weapons? I don't see many people supporting that.


This will never happen because when poor people become educated they will get jobs and stop voting liberal.
See, I like what you were saying before, but you don't make yourself look good when you ruin it with a "hurr liberals r dum" ad hominem jab


« Last Edit: October 03, 2017, 01:32:17 AM by Headcrab Zombie »

See, I like what you were saying before, but you don't make yourself look good when you ruin it with a "hurr liberals r dum" ad hominem jab
yeah, it was actually a pretty well articulated post that answered my questions other than that.

See, I like what you were saying before, but you don't make yourself look good when you ruin it with a "hurr liberals r dum" ad hominem jab

I don't think liberals are dumb at all. Their tactics are incredibly effective. Liberals rely on promising poor people stuff to stay in power. Less poor people = less votes.

Then why do conservatives deny inner-city education funding, higher minimum wages, and tax cuts for the poor? 🤔

too many poor people are unemployed let's double the cost to hire them

Then why do conservatives deny inner-city education funding, higher minimum wages, and tax cuts for the poor?

Because those are meaningless short-term solutions that destroy small businesses resulting in less jobs and more enslavement to the government. Dunno about educational funding. I'd imagine most of that funding is going into the pockets of executives anyway.

I don't think liberals are dumb at all. Their tactics are incredibly effective. Liberals rely on promising poor people stuff to stay in power. Less poor people = less votes.
So you're calling liberal voters uneducated and poor, then.
Still seems like an ad hominem attack here.
Plus there's plenty of educated, well-off liberal voters.

As I said previously, I'd describe myself as fairly liberal, but I'm still on your side of this issue here. You can't generalize one group like that, and insulting the opposition isn't the way to win favors

So you're calling liberal voters uneducated and poor, then.

No. There's a thousand reasons why somebody might be persuaded to be liberal. I don't hold anything against anyone for refusing to out themselves as a conspiracy theorist (especially after several of them '''commit Self Delete''' during the Clinton campaign). You don't agree that liberal political dogma can be very appealing to poor people lol? Obviously this isn't the only tactic, it's just one of them.
« Last Edit: October 03, 2017, 01:46:13 AM by Rally »

if you take "liberal" and replace it with "leftist" there is literally no conflict

Plus there's plenty of educated, well-off liberal voters.

You mean uni students who are as dense as a collapsing star?

dunno if it's already been said here but the LVMPD sheriff said in another update they retrieved 18 more firearms, ammunition, and explosives from the scene but as far as i can tell there's still no certain details on the specifics of the firearms

Do we know the motivation yet?