dumb rant: shadman

[Verification]

Currently, such depictions are in a legal grey area due to parts of the PROTECT Act being ruled unconstitutional on a federal level; however, laws regulating lolicon and shotacon differ between states; several states have laws that explicitly prohibit cartoon research and similar depictions (such as video games in the state of New Jersey), while others usually have only vague laws on such content; in some states, such as California, such depictions specifically do not fall under state child research laws,[70] while the state of Utah explicitly bans it.[71]

[Ad Bot]

[otto-san]

the problem with legislating loli (or at least enforcing whatever laws you make) is that with drawn research it's all ambiguous. you can go with the artist's word and suddenly everything is just ageplay and they're all actually 18 when you get into court, or you can go with what you think looks like a kid and now you're down a rabbithole of subjective, fuzzy interpretation of the same law.

the best solution is to leave the government's mitts off of art and just let people make gross art with lines and pixels since it's technically a completely victimless crime. i don't want to see a toddler getting forgeted, but i also don't want to worry about elected or appointed political figures being responsible for determining whether i should be put in jail for drawing kanna from dragon maid innocently standing next to a comically large snake.

the cool thing is that we can all mostly agree that loli is snugly in the moral red zone without the government needing to back us up on that, right

[Trogtor]

research in general should be illegal

[Vigil]

like you?

Yeah because I've certainly stated in this entire situation that I condone the actual act of child research. The only thing I've done here is defend an artist's right to draw things legally within the scope of the law. Its about as objective as it gets.

[Red Spy]

Yeah because I've certainly stated in this entire situation that I condone the actual act of child research. The only thing I've done here is defend an artist's right to draw things legally within the scope of the law. Its about as objective as it gets.

you could've said no so now i'm assuming you actually are

[Verification]

Yeah because I've certainly stated in this entire situation that I condone the actual act of child research.

You did? OK I guess. We already knew it.

[Red Spy]

You did? OK I guess. We already knew it.

i can't believe he's been exposed like this dude

[Vigil]

you could've said no so now i'm assuming you actually are

Or you could've been an adult and understood the actual argument.

You did? OK I guess. We already knew it.

xDDDDD

[IkeTheGeneric]

Obviously the reasonable thing to do here is to call everyone here a child predator

I was gonna throw in a piece about how legislation-wise, trying to police drawn art is way harder than it sounds, but having reasonable discourse here is already right out the window.

[Red Spy]

Obviously the reasonable thing to do here is to call everyone here a child predator

only vigil

[beachbum111111]

the problem with legislating loli (or at least enforcing whatever laws you make) is that with drawn research it's all ambiguous. you can go with the artist's word and suddenly everything is just ageplay and they're all actually 18 when you get into court, or you can go with what you think looks like a kid and now you're down a rabbithole of subjective, fuzzy interpretation of the same law.

the best solution is to leave the government's mitts off of art and just let people make gross art with lines and pixels since it's technically a completely victimless crime. i don't want to see a toddler getting forgeted, but i also don't want to worry about elected or appointed political figures being responsible for determining whether i should be put in jail for drawing kanna from dragon maid innocently standing next to a comically large snake.

the cool thing is that we can all mostly agree that loli is snugly in the moral red zone without the government needing to back us up on that, right

Age play should be illegal. So should ABDL

Obviously the reasonable thing to do here is to call everyone here a child predator

Sounds like something a child enthusiast would say

[Vigil]

you could've said no so now i'm assuming you actually are

Also

Despite his content and the fact I don't really care for him either

I don't agree with his art

ts gross as stuff

Reading comprehension is an elementary school skill

[hootaloo]

Obviously the reasonable thing to do here is to call everyone here a child predator

welcome to the blf. if people can put negative tags on someone, they will, only to feel better about them selves

in this case: vigil is into cp, why? because he said loli is ok to draw
sounds like some people really needed validation after jerking off to some rancid stuff

[IkeTheGeneric]

only vigil

I understand the comedic purpose of hyperbole on cut-and-dry topics like lolicon but honest to god, this is just pathetic

Ganging up on a dude and throwing out accusations of child enthusiasm just makes you look like a bunch of rabid cunts

[Red Spy]

Reading comprehension is an elementary school skill

is that the best you can come up with