Author Topic: Mass Shooting Megathread | Rancho Tehama, CA | 5 dead, shooter down  (Read 19488 times)

it's definitely not as prevalent in christians though
bruh

bruh
i guess it depends on how you interpret "less prevailent." There are a lot of self righteous christians by virtue that there's a lot of them. I dunno.

Speaking of which, has anyone every looked into the specific legislation some states have passed against "assault weapons"? The only difference between a legal gun and an illegal "assault weapon" could be something like the addition of an adjustable stock. Now, can anyone who is advocating the banning of "assault weapons" explain to me how an adjustable stock makes a weapon more dangerous? It becomes even sillier when you release it works in reverse: that you can make an otherwise illegal gun suddenly become legal, simply by removing such harmless features.
The idea is to choke gun ownership slowly by introducing "minor" laws, from barrel length to magazine capacity, to whatever the hell you want to name. Slippery slopes are often thought of as "fast" but reality is it can be slow. A legislator who wants something removed from society wouldn't just go for a cold turkey ban. Its easier to add little nuances and grey areas everywhere to discourage peoples interests and hobbies into said thing, for fear of doing something illegal. Like a net more or less. I do beleive we will eventually turn into a society where (Look at the UK) even knife ownership is under extreme scrutiny. Most people would just wave their hand and be like "Bah, would never happen." and then next thing you know, you're going to jail for looking threatening with a butter knife in your hand.


well yeah chicago has a gang problem, but wouldn't you consider guns to be a huge contributor to that problem as a whole? yeah theres other issues like stuffty schooling, horrible housing problems, etc. guns are just another factor, and this applies to cities outside of chicago as well. getting rid of guns wouldnt remove the problem tomorrow obviously, but the deathrate would no doubt go down, and itd be harder for gangs to operate overall. you dont think any sort of additional laws should be passed at all in indiana to help stop this? why? whats the downside? do those benefits outweigh helping to deter 4000+ gun-related incidents per year (using only chicago as an example)? is regulating these weapon sales too much government interference?

again, i dont think something like this specific situation is a catch-all solution to everything, but it helps, and benfits the general public.
It's already illegal for people like felons to own firearms, and there's a federal mandate on dealers to run background checks before all sales.
And I fully support that.

Could more control be beneficial? Maybe. If you have any specific ideas on what kind of legislation would help, I'm open to listening to ideas, but I can't address specific downsides if there's no specific proposal

But the problem is that all the recent legislation I've heard wouldn't actually make a difference, it just sounds nice to people who don't know guns. Take, for example, the call to ban bumpfire stocks after the Vegas shooting. It sounded reasonable at first, even to me. But then I did more research, and I realized a major flaw with that: you don't need a bumpfire stock in order to bumpfire. You don't need any sort of special equipment or modification. You can bumpfire with the belt loop on your pants. And thus, banning bumpfire stocks does nothing

do those benefits outweigh helping to deter 4000+ gun-related incidents per year?
I don't like this argument because it reduces my side of the issue to "people dying is fine as long as I keep muh freedoms" when that's really not true
Hell, I've never even owned a gun.
I want the problems fixed, but we're blaming guns for an underlying societal issue instead of addressing the root problem. And when we do ban things, we ban things that don't make a difference, like bumpfire stocks or pistol grips

Social issues mainly point to education and i personally think that that is more important than knee jerk law making.

the more these things happen the more appealing compulsory firearm ownership and concealed carry licenses look, though I realize that's an extreme





What about compulsory firearm education?
I got my firearm safety certificate through a highschool class

What about compulsory firearm education?
I got my firearm safety certificate through a highschool class

that'd be the more moderate version of what I'm advocating

totally a good idea

I'd like to ask you what your stance is on legalizing silencers
I know it would've made the Las Vegas shooter easier to locate because people wouldn't be having their ears blown out, but I'm not sure this shooting would have been stopped by that neighbor if this shooter had a silencer, given the different environments these took place in
« Last Edit: November 08, 2017, 02:04:59 PM by Tactical Nuke »

the more these things happen the more appealing compulsory firearm ownership and concealed carry licenses look, though I realize that's an extreme

Arming large swaths of untrained citizens is going to do more harm than good, based on how many accidental gun deaths happen annually.


the more these things happen the more appealing
it shouldn't even come off as that either

Arming large swaths of untrained citizens is going to do more harm than good, based on how many accidental gun deaths happen annually.
^ not everyone is fit to own a gun