Author Topic: FelipeO_O_: Retarder, stuffposterer, Brazilianer  (Read 5885 times)

there's a literal "third world" and there's a colloquial third world
He's obviously trying to argue the literal definition though, which is the funny part because it shows how irrelevant the term is

He's obviously trying to argue the literal definition though, which is the funny part because it shows how irrelevant the term is

Grimlock thought he was still logged in to his Ronald Reagan account

why did you bring it up beach now he's going to spend the next week bragging about how he got kimon banned once


Brazil is a poverty stricken and crime riddled stuffhole, it's a third world country.

it's a third world country.
Well no, it'd be a 'developing country' now. 'Third world' doesn't make sense in a modern context.

Well no, it'd be a 'developing country' now. 'Third world' doesn't make sense in a modern context.

uhhhhhhhhhhhh brother what? lol

[iamg]https://i.imgur.com/nmH7n5r.png[/img]
uhhhhhhhhhhhh brother what? lol
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World

Educate yourself



I'd take Google's definition over a definition on a website anyone can edit

While some of the posts in the op could be argued as explicit, I don't personally see an issue with any of them.

/nosupport


I'd take Google's definition over a definition on a website anyone can edit

You're going to some insane lengths to be right about this

I'd take Google's definition over a definition on a website anyone can edit

damn i haven't heard that line since middle school book reports

People are arguing over the semantics of an outdated term. How about we argue whether or not Brazil is a stuffhole?