classic inh-esque flaming to avoid having to pose a substantial argument
so what do you expect youtube to do, continue paying the content creator even though they decided finally it was not suitable for advertisers?
Borderline strawman argument, that poses no solution and pushes an egotistical nihilistic perspective.Basically sending a message along the lines of:"I can't find an answer, so neither will you. Just give up."
It's not a strawman, i was legitimately asking what he's expecting youtube to do. next time try adding non-handicapped opinions to the conversation, if even possible. A question is not an argument, so its exempt from fallacy
Thats what makes it borderline.You didn't pose a question you posed a sarcastic rhetorical question that over simplified his argument.
Lmao how do you get your richard chopped off by Matthew
it wasn't sarcastic or rhetoric. stop strawmanning my question and try providing something to the topic besides trying to cross examine my stuff
i didnt. he's just sperging out as usual
But he's right.
Huh? No im agreeing with you...