[news] school shooting Santa Fe highschool

[Conan]

here's what's going to happen now
I'm going to post a source to a trending article and you're going to actively ignore it or say something dismissive and handicapped and then we're going to get into another flame war

ready
go
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/20/opinion/santa-fe-school-shooting.html

what does this change in terms even mean? i don't get the significance

[Ad Bot]

[IkeTheGeneric]

here's what's going to happen now
I'm going to post a source to a trending article and you're going to actively ignore it or say something dismissive and handicapped and then we're going to get into another flame war

ready
go
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/20/opinion/santa-fe-school-shooting.html

So because one editor of new york times said combat guns now all 'leftists' do? For a stuffwad who doesn't like being pigeonholed with national socialists because of your conservative views, you sure do spend a lot of time generalizing everyone on the other side of the compass.

Maybe it's because you're a short-sighted moron or maybe there's some other ulterior motive. Either way, you're a cunt for trying to use a school shooting topic as a soapbox for your political bullstuff

[Punished Rally]

But weren't the combat weapons based on the AR-15?

[Aplem]

Guns are good.

deal with it :)

[Punished Rally]

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/20/opinion/santa-fe-school-shooting.html

This article blows. Nowhere did they mention that the shooter used a shotgun and a revolver (and homemade loving bombs) but somehow still managed to work 'combat guns' somewhere in there. Standing on the graves, as usual. They're not even hiding it anymore lmfao

[IkeTheGeneric]

they're not even trying to hide it anymore

They're not even hiding it anymore lmfao

Reading off of cue cards, fellas?

[Punished Rally]

Reading off of cue cards, fellas?

Next one says: forget you ike

[Aplem]

Next one says: forget you ike

forget

my script must be in the wrong order... what page are we on?

[IkeTheGeneric]

this is extremely dangerous to our democracy

[Anybody]

This article blows. Nowhere did they mention that the shooter used a shotgun and a revolver (and homemade loving bombs) but somehow still managed to work 'combat guns' somewhere in there. Standing on the graves, as usual. They're not even hiding it anymore lmfao

Maybe because it's not and article but an opinion piece. And the combat guns was mentioned in a quote from a different article talking about "active shooter" drills became normal for a generation of American schoolchildren and not any one specific shooting.

[Punished Rally]

And the combat guns was mentioned in a quote from a different article

The Vox article? It wasn't though

[Anybody]

The Vox article? It wasn't though

My mistake, but still the opinion piece itself doesn't talk about the specifics of the most recent shooting, it's seems to be more on the general antipathy towards the issue in the political climate.


And even then, the sentence you pointed out

We have too many guns in this country,

In the writers opinion there are too many guns, in-general

including too many based on combat weapons,

Then they make a point of how many of the aforementioned guns are based on military designs

and as a result we have too many shootings and deaths.

And then goes on to state their opinion based on their earlier observations.

[thegoodperry]

here's what's going to happen now
I'm going to post a source to a trending article and you're going to actively ignore it or say something dismissive and handicapped and then we're going to get into another flame war

ready
go
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/20/opinion/santa-fe-school-shooting.html

/opinion/

lol straws were grasped

[thegoodperry]

also i love how everyone is just fighting with each other over stupid issues like labels for guns and the shooters affiliation when nobody has brought up the fact that the father didn't even own a gun safe and the shooter basically nabbed the guns from his father for the shooting.

is nobody going to bring up such an injustice in gun safety? i've said this a couple times before but i think gun safes should be required in order to own a firearm

[Tactical Nuke]

this happens every time the left loses the debate; rather than concede or alter their arguments, they just change the language behind it so that it becomes so general that there's no way that you can disagree with them

like when they changed "global warming" to "climate change" because you can't contest something as vague as "the climate is always changing"

you can't be against "common-sense gun reform" can you? what are you, insane