[NEWS] child love traffiking camp found.

[Alteration]

It still hasn't been proven to be fake.

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

Textbook example

[Ad Bot]

[King Tøny]

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

Textbook example

Every news media claimed pizzagate was a hoax and yet they refused to investigate it.

So how do they know for sure it's a hoax if they don't want to investigate?

[King Tøny]

If there is one thing about the media you should find suspicious is that.

When the news all comes together to claim something is fake so loving fast without proof then you know something fishy is up.


usually news medias are like "we will wait till we have the details" but for pizzagate it was more like "nope it's fake"

[Alteration]

Every news media claimed pizzagate was a hoax and yet they refused to investigate it.

So how do they know for sure it's a hoax if they don't want to investigate?

That's not any more of a valid argument than before, you're just restating what you already said. It is not our job to prove pizzagate didn't happen. It is your job to produce credible evidence that it happened.

[Bisjac]

the pizzagate evidence was in the emails and on wieners confiscated laptop. politicians discussion private parties with kids being sent in for entertainment. and using all sorts of weird code words in strange contexts. all of this is still held as evidence and we dont know what investigations are currently going on.
the dems have fought hard to retrieve the evidence and failed. they are on a pr defense now.

the whole thing with that 1 pizza place may or may not be related at all. some guys made that connection and checked themselves.

[IkeTheGeneric]

what the forget is that great awakening subreddit

why are you all so loving crazy

[Master Matthew²]

https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/burden-of-proof

Textbook example

It's true that the burden of proof falls on the onr making the claim.

But without evidence its false or true, it's simply unknown.
But the fact the media claimed it to be a hoax without presenting it's origin or creator makes the media untrustworthy.

Yes, there is no proof it's true.
Yes, the burden of proof falls on the claim.
No, not proven true does not make the claim false, it makes to claim baseless.
Yes, claiming something is fake without presenting evidence makes you a liar, just as much as claiming something is true without presenting evidence.
So, yeah the msm is not trustworthy.

[IkeTheGeneric]

It's fake until it isn't. If you think otherwise, you're a newcigarette.

[kanew2000]

i swear to loving god matthew when you want to rant about something you could in the least get the goddamn name right. its msn. you dumb bitch. not msm.

unless you mean mainstream media in which case just type it out its not that hard

[Master Matthew²]

It's fake until it isn't. If you think otherwise, you're a newcigarette.

If false = 0
And true = 1

And negative = 0
And positive = 1
Until you prove you're not an idiot, you are.

Being an idiot = negative
Nit being an idiot = positive

i swear to loving god matthew when you want to rant about something you could in the least get the goddamn name right. its msn. you dumb bitch. not msm.

Msm = Main-Stream Media

[IkeTheGeneric]

i swear to loving god matthew when you want to rant about something you could in the least get the goddamn name right. its msn. you dumb bitch. not msm.

MSM is shorthand for mainstream media. He's basically a news hipster, but instead of sipping his soy mocha latte while typing into his macbook pro he's sipping apple juice while typing into his e-machine lmfao

If false = 0
And true = 1

And negative = 0
And positive = 1
Until you prove you're not an idiot, you are.

Being an idiot = negative
Nit being an idiot = positive

Newcigarette spotted

[Alteration]

It's true that the burden of proof falls on the onr making the claim.

Yes, it is. This is where you post can end.

But without evidence its false or true, it's simply unknown.

...sure? But I think you really only believe it because you have a hate boner for lefties.

But the fact the media claimed it to be a hoax without presenting it's origin or creator makes the media untrustworthy.

Well who broke the story? I heard it first from Humble Water Filter Merchant, who later denied it.

Yes, the burden of proof falls on the claim.
No, not proven true does not make the claim false, it makes to claim baseless.

These are contradictory statements. I also barely understood what you meant.

Yes, claiming something is fake without presenting evidence makes you a liar, just as much as claiming something is true without presenting evidence.

This is handicapped. I do not need proof because the lack of proof on your end is my proof.

[King Tøny]

It's fake until it isn't. If you think otherwise, you're a newcigarette.

It should neither be false nor true unless there is evidence otherwise to say so.

[King Tøny]

You can't prove religion like god is real.

It's fake till proven.

[Bisjac]

there is stuffloads of evidence on this lol. like tons. videos and images. they have dna and possessions as well.
whats the issue?

you realize every scandal throughout history started as a crazy conspiracy theory right?
people that NEED it to not be true fight the hardest to deny it. you can see the fear in their typing how quickly they dismiss it all.