Grammar national socialists: How far would they take a grammatical error?

Author Topic: Grammar national socialists: How far would they take a grammatical error?  (Read 9259 times)

I don't need to clarify if it was a typo or not.

We all know nika is not a word.




By the context of the post you know I didn't meant nika.

There is no recent controversy surrounding the word nika, but there is controversy about nike.

There is a thing called common sense.

You don't need to beat a topic to death over a typo.

For example if I said "sotp" instead of "stop" anyone with common sense would know I meant stop. You don't need to kill a topic over a typo.

greenbh doesnt even have half the iq of tony

but I knew nika was a word and tony didn't


but I knew nika was a word and tony didn't

Yeah a loving greek word.

How would I know it's a word if I don't speak greek?

You probably just googled it anyways.

You probably just googled it anyways.


stuff tony im sorry I didnt mean it honest

Speaking of which.



Quote
Nike (mythology)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Nike
Goddess of victory
Goddess Nike

So it's quite obvious that Nike and Nika are the same loving thing and the company nike is clearly using the greek inspiration of nike/nika for the goddess of victory.

So typo or not I'm not wrong. Nike and Nika mean the same loving thing.

Imagine that, the typo was not inherently wrong the entire time.

So postal and nobody stuff up my thread for no reason.

the shoe says nike not nika


tony is that an e or an a at the end of the word


the shoe says nike not nika

But you people knew what I meant anyways, you didn't need to kill a thread to prove a point.