Wouldn't we have to grow even more soy to feed a majority vegan population
Do people not understand the transitive property
it still would be less, because the amount of grain you need to feed livestock if you just skip it and feed a human
also a lot less logistics are involved so you use less fossil fules/water/etc.
Tony is missing the point.
Cutting down on eating beef =/= going vegan, for one.
But also, beef imports were going down.
https://beef2live.com/story-beef-imports-country-2015-vs-2016-0-155400
Exports are down on beef too.
https://beef2live.com/story-beef-exports-country-year-date-0-109756
However, for some reason, we dropped massively in beef trade with australia.While beef imports to.the US are down, brazil's beef exports are up.
Veganism is not the only clear answer. The media only knows how to give extremist solutions to problems.
I mean, if the whole world was vegan there would be a lot less problems, it would massively simplify a lot of things.
as for the media, they just keep arbitrarily blaming stuff because they want to shift the blame onto the consumer.
its easier to think you are at fault and you can do something by becoming vegan but this is untrue.
it's an illusion to distract that multinational corporations are the ones creating massive amounts of pollution and deforestation and the only way to fight that is through radical systematic change of the way we produce stuff/regulation.