Total Members Voted: 14
i dont give enough of a stuff to read the article but as long as nobodys living on the land thats being sold im ballingim probably dead wrong tho
can we just get an f for the millions of people who are now homeless/forced into being indian/whatever
It's important to note that the case concerned jurisdiction, not land ownership.Ruling that these lands are in fact reservations "doesn't mean the tribe owns all the land within the reservation, just like the county doesn't own all the land within the county. In fact, it probably doesn't own very much of that land," Washburn explained. "That's not what a reservation is these days."Washburn compares a reservation to a county — terms that describe jurisdictional boundaries.
did you even read