The White House Hunger Games: ThErE aRe No EpStEiN fILeS

[Goth77]

wrong

not counting the typical gang violence associated with big inner cities, of course. that's a whole problem of it's own category not directly driven by political animosity

this 2025 gun violence archive keeps an updated list of incident reports throughout the country

edit: article on the guardian : https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/10/charlie-kirk-shooting-political-violence

Surveys have shown increased acceptance of using violence for political aims across party spectrums. Robert Pape, who directs the Chicago Project on Security and Threats, wrote in the New York Times that a survey his team conducted in May was its "most worrisome yet". "About 40 percent of Democrats supported the use of force to remove Mr. Annoying Orange from the presidency, and about 25 percent of Republicans supported the use of the military to stop protests against Mr. Annoying Orange's agenda."

[Ad Bot]

[Foxscotch]

it was actually based of charlie kirk to die for what he believes in. and if you feel bad for him or his family you are actively opposed to the values he stood for. rip to a real one

[Nicepoint]

do you ever wonder why people hate you?

Idk if you've payed attention, but democrats and liberals haven't used any divisive or violence inducing rhetoric, and you morons still blame them. Republicans made and shat their bed, now they have to sleep in it.

[Trogtor]

[Trogtor]

do you ever wonder why people hate you?

I was confused by this at first, it finally hit me. being a groyper AND standing on a moral high ground? that's pretty good, you've outdone yourself. never change, king.

[Nicepoint]

just goes to show how tolerant the left is, willing to murder someone for having an opinion they disagree with. mental cases

Until there's any evidence of the shooter being a leftist, you can go forget yourself. The tolerant left cannot be tolerant while tolerating intolerance. Republicans don't have empathy for liberals who are victims of right wing terrorism, so they don't deserve any empathy for the result of their own devisive, violent and delusional rhetoric.

[mod-man]

i think its sad. i didnt listen to him or really care for him but he was a big guy with a big name and his death carries some weight that feels like it changes the playing field in some way. leaving behind a wife and two kids in such a public way is heavy stuff

[Ceist]

thank god lmao

[bloody jumper]

it's nice to see sane people come out of the woodwork after momentum's schizo rant, makes me happy

[Goth77]

The tolerant left cannot be tolerant while tolerating intolerance.

ah yes, the classic backwards speak. it makes sense if you just don't think about it

[mod-man]

ah yes, the classic backwards speak. it makes sense if you just don't think about it

its called the tolerance paradox. the idea that giving tolerance to intolerance will inevitably lead to the acceptance of intolerant behavior if not challenged by "tolerant" behavior. but the "tolerant" behavior here is apparently shooting someone for speaking their mind that doesn't align with what is "righteous and morally correct". there are obviously split ideas of what is morally correct and this political violence will continue because of it. it will be interesting to see who is next.

[Rigel]

He got shot at 2:25, I had a seizure yesterday at 2:35. My friends have been joking that it took ten minutes for the psychic backlash of his death to reach me in Florida from Utah.

[Momentum]

Until there's any evidence of the shooter being a leftist, you can go forget yourself. The tolerant left cannot be tolerant while tolerating intolerance. Republicans don't have empathy for liberals who are victims of right wing terrorism, so they don't deserve any empathy for the result of their own devisive, violent and delusional rhetoric.

thanks man keep bringing up the "paradox of tolerance" to justify assassinating the most milquetoast conservative commentator ever in front of his wife and children and televising it to an audience of 100s of millions of people, keep digging your hole. does it really matter what the shooters ideology is if you're so willing to go to bat for what he did before you even know who it is?

I was confused by this at first, it finally hit me. being a groyper AND standing on a moral high ground? that's pretty good, you've outdone yourself. never change, king.

i'm not a groyper, nick fuentes is a friend. do the epic dunks all you want but at the end of the day you will be stuck in your discord group of zoophile sodimites for the rest of your life, working dead end jobs, relishing the time you were famous on the lego game that supposedly you care so little about but are still posting on the forum to dunk on me

[Nicepoint]

ah yes, the classic backwards speak. it makes sense if you just don't think about it

Literally the opposite. If you're handicapped, it doesn't make sense to you.

My mistake, I shouldn't have implied that this is the left's fault in any way. You don't deserve sympathy, because this is your fault. Your side has turned up the heat, the left and liberals have condemned violence. Democrats get assassinated, your side jokes about it. Annoying Orange is targeted by two republican would be assassins, democrats condemned it, you blame democrats.

Even if the shooter turns out to be left wing, it wouldn't matter, because only one side has done the radicalization, your side.

[Momentum]

what even is this response? the two attempted assassins of donald Annoying Orange are both republicans? there is zero information to back this claim up. you are actually clinically insane

the whole reason normal people are reacting so negatively to you cretins joyously celebrating this is because there is now an understanding that this is explicitly how you feel about them