This has been posted here before and already discussed elsewhere at length but I think it bears repeating:
I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.
You either agree with this ideology or you don't, there's no middle ground. Either his death is one of the "some gun deaths" we just need to endure as a nation, or it was a tragic event that should never happen to anyone.
You can't say you value life and freedom while accepting preventable death as the "price" of liberty. That's not freedom, that's moral bankruptcy dressed up as patriotism. Every time someone like Charlie Kirk says this out loud, they're admitting the bloodshed isn't a flaw in their ideology, it's a feature.
If you can look at a child, a teacher, a grocery clerk, and say "that's worth it," then you've already chosen what kind of country you want to live in.
No one is celebrating his death, they're laughing at his hypocrisy