Author Topic: The White House Hunger Games: ThErE aRe No EpStEiN fILeS  (Read 67490 times)


For the record I appreciate the back and forth we had about I/P. I at this point am much less heavy headed for Israel than I was but still highly support them of course, I do though think there's lots of room for improvement. I realize though beyond that level of stuff I'd have to do a hell of a lot of research into modern politics to dissect exactly what to do currently so idk.

But again, I really do appreciate the conversation.

Edit: also remember everyone, anyone ripping from the site has to use the word filter unless they are a member. You can narrow down who's who from this possibly.
« Last Edit: Today at 10:37:32 AM by Soukuw »

This has been posted here before and already discussed elsewhere at length but I think it bears repeating:

Quote from: Charlie Kirk
I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights.

You either agree with this ideology or you don't, there's no middle ground. Either his death is one of the "some gun deaths" we just need to endure as a nation, or it was a tragic event that should never happen to anyone.

You can't say you value life and freedom while accepting preventable death as the "price" of liberty. That's not freedom, that's moral bankruptcy dressed up as patriotism. Every time someone like Charlie Kirk says this out loud, they're admitting the bloodshed isn't a flaw in their ideology, it's a feature.

If you can look at a child, a teacher, a grocery clerk, and say "that's worth it," then you've already chosen what kind of country you want to live in.

No one is celebrating his death, they're laughing at his hypocrisy


This has been posted here before and already discussed elsewhere at length but I think it bears repeating:

You either agree with this ideology or you don't, there's no middle ground. Either his death is one of the "some gun deaths" we just need to endure as a nation, or it was a tragic event that should never happen to anyone.

You can't say you value life and freedom while accepting preventable death as the "price" of liberty. That's not freedom, that's moral bankruptcy dressed up as patriotism. Every time someone like Charlie Kirk says this out loud, they're admitting the bloodshed isn't a flaw in their ideology, it's a feature.

If you can look at a child, a teacher, a grocery clerk, and say "that's worth it," then you've already chosen what kind of country you want to live in.

This is exactly it.

No one is celebrating his death, they're laughing at his hypocrisy

Well, to be fair we don't know if we wouldn't have considered his own death worth it by the function of it being his own death.
I would be surprised if he did.

This is more about the hypocrisy of those around him now, more than himself.

His wife mourned him by going on an "everyone will suffer the consequences" super villain monologue

How sweet
For the right, that is a cash grab.
Anger, rage, fear, panic and vengeance are what sells in those circles.

You need to keep the angry mob momentum going to live under a red hat.