Author Topic: Really bad city builds  (Read 2959 times)

Okay, I've seen a BUNCH of really bad city servers that are hosted by people that no one has ever heard of. Most of them either are really messed up (Cities on The Slopes map...wtf?), are plain empty (8 bricks after being up for a while with 5 people) or just plain look fail (1000 bricks, not WIP, one person who no one knows).

Only Diggy's City server actually looked good. Let's cut down on the city servers, okay? Go ahead call me a hypocrite for saying "STOP MAEKIN CITY BILDZ N RPGZ", but at least the city builds I host are actually good...

I have noticed this, it is really annoying. It is just as bad as people making builds based off of other games that look nothing like that they are basing it off of.
« Last Edit: May 23, 2008, 11:29:50 PM by jungemann »

City RPGs are fun when the hosts aren't 8 yrs old. And if I had a good city save I would host one :D
« Last Edit: May 24, 2008, 01:58:56 PM by Yeturn »

Tom

I need to host the CBC city again.

City RPGs are fun when the hosts aren't 8 yrs old.
Ha, those ones are usually comprised of a gun shop.....and nothing else. They seem to confuse that a City RPG is not a death match.

I miss the dedicated city build. :(

I wish i was in retail when there was a dedicated city build :(

Tom

I had a dedi city build about a month ago, but it was an epic fail unless I was there all the time or there was no n00bs or newbs on it.

Does mine suck? D:

What we really need is a dedicated city RPG that's hosted on a fast connection, has good structure, with plenty players and a few admins on constantly, an occasional DM and a great setting. That would be awesome.

Does mine suck? D:
If you're a nine year old noob whose city comprises of stuff box buildings, then yes.

I've seen it before, and it's win. So no.


I was planning on make a huge city where 12 people could fit in the server and post about it on the forums here.

12  people? is that it?

I wish Badspot hosted a dedi city build :(