Ahg, that's not what I was saying at all! It was the fact that IBanZ kept coming in with the same line: "Why can't you grasp there is no life after death" for ever single idea!
My name is Iban. Why can't you grasp that my name is Iban
Also, unless I am suffering from amnesia, I only iterated that particular line once.
I myself have read the bible. I've read the old testament in said bible, so therefore have read the Tanakh. I have every right to discredit every thing that was said in that book.
k.
What I wasn't doing was accusing him of being emo just so I could say he was atheist, yes I too am angered by the people who claim to be so, but have never set a foot in church, or haven't even read the bible. But what I was getting at, was his close minded depressing pompous statements were so annoying, even if they were logical, he kept using the same logic over and over again! So you tell me how I wasn't to become slightly annoyed by this? Let people discuss what they feel like discussing, don't simply come in as if you're all knowing.
Emo =/= Atheists. Albert Einstein, in his later letters, hinted at his disbelieve in a higher being. However, he didn't have jet black hair and cry about how life doesn't dish out favorable cards.
I have set foot in a church. In fact, the last time I went to a church was a couple of months ago to hear my grandmother sing, as she was ever so proud of her spot on the quire. When I went, my mother and I were bombarded with pamphlets requesting donations. This did not help my opinion of the church. Also, I was born and raised a Catholic. I'm also baptized. I have attended church every Sunday for a vast period of my life. I even read areas of the bible that my debate rivals tell me to read so I can get a more informed opinion. None of this has changed my ideology that the bible is bullstuff. My mind is an open book, however. I do not sit here and fortify by receptors with cast iron. No, what I do do is comprehend what I read and make decisions on my own two feet. I am biased towards Science, and that is all.
And my points were not all the same. Just because I used the same logical process to obtain what I say does not mean that what I said was identical. You see, in each one of my posts what i stated was based off what I know and what I can assume. I know that when you die you begin to decompose and I know that the destruction of the brain ends all thought and signs of life. With this, I can easily, and logically, assume that after you die and after your brain and body are destroyed, there is nothing left.
The only reason you are annoyed is because logic and reasoning is a holy man's cryptonite. It stings at your very soul when you have to rationalize for your god. Just so you don't need to think about your surroundings and actualize the reality of hard questions like "What happens when you die?" and "Why won't god heal amputees?" you will stand up for nonsensical ideologies in order to rest comfortably in sheer bliss. I would never want to be you because I would never want to be so blind.
And I never said "omg u guis shuttup!!! u all think wrong things!", I clearly stated what I believe and what for and allowed everyone (including you) to pitch in your 2 cents. I speak with knowledge and confidence, not with omnipresence. If I am, for any reason, incorrect, cite your sources and I will review what I understand as fact. I am an open, yet critical, book. Write upon me if you dare.
it has to do with everything, It basically says that there is no defiant solution to any problem and that all reality co-exist at any one point in time. The problem is that only one reality is found upon measurement of this paradox(seeing hearing taste touch smell ect). The thing is that the measurement that we are using says that there is no god/creator. Just the existance of this info says that there is no god because he would just create 1 reality.
It makes sense but what you're saying is so vague, how do you know god didn't create a multiverse? How does anyone know?
You're right. No one knows. However, a lot of people are trying not to rationalize the unknown with fairy tales and silly archaic moral guidelines written 2,000 years ago.
