Your one to talk.
You typed up a paragraph on how Ephi tried to help, then you attacked him. I rest my case.
Could you quote the paragraph you speak of, I still don't know what your referring to.
What shawnpup is trying to say is that laremere's making out that I told him to make this topic, when what I actually said was "if you want to continue this, create a drama thread" because it wasn't cool crapping up someone's help topic. laremere clearly wants to continue this, hence this thread here.
From my perspective this just seems to be some pathetic attempt to one-up the guy you see as being superior to yourself. Either way I have more useful things to do than play your silly games.
If you got the impression that I was saying you said to just start this topic, I'm terribly sorry, what I meant is that I wanted to continue this discussion, and you said I should start a topic in drama to continue this instead of continuing it in the current topic it was in, and I agreed, so I started this topic.
I note that your barely saying anything remotely relevant to what this is actually about, and just using allot of generalized statements about how I'm somehow personally attacking you, which is not at all the case. None of my posts (I've reread them several times) at any point do I see myself trying to one-up you personally or show how I'm better then you. Sure I did post code after you posted code that I saw flawed in a way that gave no help to the topic creator because that is much more of a problem that the one you solved, but that has nothing to do with personally attacking you, I was simply posting code as an example (exactly what he asked for) to show him how to properly have bricks cost.
I think this whole mess got started here:
Oh honestly. If I wrote code that didn't have a design floor, this guy wouldn't have to do anything. The "design flaw" in your code is that it doesn't even charge the user money.
Please don't post code that has design flaws, laremere!
I think this is were you started getting the idea that I'm out to get you. I'm yet to understand your reasoning behind this post.
First of all, if the coder took the code that you posted and used it, I highly doubt that they would have been able to figure out how to get around the inherited flaw in it. This would have caused the release of a code that would be quite sad.
You then continued to say that my code was flawed in a totally false way. The poster of the topic asked simply for an example of the code, so I pulled out my flash drive that had a copy of my ex-arctic RPG (which I never planed releasing any of it, mind you) that had code to show how to make it cost something to plant bricks. By saying that my code had the flaw of that it doesn't cost money is just stupid, because it showed exactly what the poster asked for.