Conspiracy Thread

[General Nick]

http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/

that entire thing.

I lol'd.

[Ad Bot]

[Netwars4]

I lol'd.

had to research that bull for history; it was such stuff.

[General Cameron]

WTC Collapse- Detonation?
Flight 93- American Airlines pilot saw 93's tail number on a 737, and found 93 as active and flights 11 and the other one as dead.
Zuneplayer forgetup- At 12:00 This new years eve, the Zunes shat themselves on their chargers, resulting in a required manual refresh.


Flight 93 video 1- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsCh_UGKvSc&feature=related
Couldn't find video 2.

[General Nick]

WTC Collapse- Detonation? Fire from jet plane fuel melted steel and made it collapse.
Flight 93- American Airlines pilot saw 93's tail number on a 737, and found 93 as active and flights 11 and the other one as dead. Coincidence?
Zuneplayer forgetup- At 12:00 This new years eve, the Zunes shat themselves on their chargers, resulting in a required manual refresh. This is just plain handicapped.

[General Cameron]

Actually, some good scientists are saying that there's evidence of implosion. Plus, the jet fuel was not at a high enough temperature to melt the steel. What you have heard is the famouse "pancake effect" theory. It has been disproven because of the extensive interior support. Also, the trees that ran up the sides of the building would have easily carried the weight of the upper half of the building LIKE THEY WERE DESIGNED TO DO.

[Netwars4]

Actually, some good scientists are saying that there's evidence of implosion. Plus, the jet fuel was not at a high enough temperature to melt the steel.Friction. ever heard of it?
What you have heard is the famouse "pancake effect" theory. It has been disproven because of the extensive interior support. half that stuff was gone since oh you know, a plane ran into it. Also, the trees that ran up the sides of the building would have easily carried the weight of the upper half of the building LIKE THEY WERE DESIGNED TO DO.

ive never heard of trees being used to support a building, im guessing you meant buttresses?
also can you tell me these scientists and where you heard this from?

[General Cameron]

On tv they called them supporting "trees".
They were the bars that ran up the sides of the building.

[Reformist]

Douchebaggery

[General Nick]

Actually, some good scientists are saying that there's evidence of implosion. Plus, the jet fuel was not at a high enough temperature to melt the steel. And how do they know that? Were they right there at the time? No. The fuel alone didn't melt the steel, the fuel ignited fires did. It was hot enough to melt steel. What you have heard is the famouse "pancake effect" theory. It has been disproven because of the extensive interior support. Actually, over half of the interior support where the plane crashed had been destroyed, so it started to eventually lean and fall. Also, the trees that ran up the sides of the building would have easily carried the weight of the upper half of the building LIKE THEY WERE DESIGNED TO DO. Highly unlikely. They alone cannot support the entire building.

[Netwars4]

Douchebaggery

@who?

[Hiiro3293]

that hulu is really trying to gush down our brains O.o