Battlefield 1943.

Author Topic: Battlefield 1943.  (Read 3382 times)

Frostbite engine is bull stuff. BFBC's destructibility is more or less the same thing as "cut outs".

Well, it's still quite fun, and it isn't just destruction, graphics and the physics, and *GASP* THE GAMEPLAY!

Physics in the game are pretty standard. Gameplay sucks ass compared to every other BF game.


It's not out yet.
If it is anything like BC then it will be awful.

Also how can you say the gameplay, and physics are good if it isn't out yet?

Seeing the loving engine before.

BC was trying to be a call of duty. i wouldn't even call it a true battlefield.
leeching the title name to help sell a completely different type of game is lame




Console! Whoa I'm totally not buying it! This looks like one of those weak attempts to avoid pirating. Battlefield: Bad Company was pretty crap, everything felt weird and nothing like Battlefield, people who acutally like playing it online are freaks/Console Freaks/losers.

You just contradicted your past posts.
I did but I also did the same with Marcem's. So this argument is null.

Chase, have you had enough?  ALSO, IT WILL BE FOR PC, DUH.

I'll start by saying that I loved the first three games up to 2142. I didn't care much for the future warfare, and the console versions were stuff. Seeing this announced, I was pretty excited...  until I did some research.

Success:
•Frostbite engine
•Destructible environments

Fail:
•Only 24 players
•Only 3 maps
•Only 3 classes (no medic/engineer)
•Auto Ammo
•Auto Health
•All classes will have anti-vehicle weapons

Edit: It will be for PC As well. It's expected to cost $15-$20, and will be download only at the size of 350MB.
« Last Edit: February 06, 2009, 05:18:13 PM by Bones4 »

Fail:
•Only 24 players (Prevents lag issues, can be good/bad)
•Only 3 maps (I actually like the low amount of maps)
•Only 3 classes (no medic/engineer) (forget.)
•Auto Ammo (?)
•Auto Health (?)
•All classes will have anti-vehicle weapons (Disgusting.)