Poll

Is Iban nice?

Yes
58 (45%)
No
55 (42.6%)
Maybe
16 (12.4%)

Total Members Voted: 10

Author Topic: Iban's Mean IRC  (Read 17145 times)

Need me to call the WAAAAAAAAAAAMbulance?

Need me to call the cigarette brigade?
Because that was incredibly gay.

Need me to call the cigarette brigade?
Because that was incredibly gay.

Nice little sin-free Catholic response there.

I can say make fun of you with a smile and not feel guilty about it at the same time, I'm that good.

Well, I partially agree with him. I hate Christians who preach on online games and preach about 2012 and bullstuff like that.
qft

I can say make fun of you with a smile and not feel guilty about it at the same time, I'm that good.

So not feeling guilty is the same as being forgiven?  Nice.

Didn't know sins were so trivial.  I should try this not feeling guilty illusion stuff sometime.

I love how religion debates get started, by the feeling of wanting to argue something "more important than ones' self" and then basing all the "facts" on personal beliefs rather than maintaining that "greater importance" feeling which originally fueled the debate.

Then again it's all a bunch of bullstuff, idiots trying to elevate themselves in a vain attempt to look deep.

Let's base something on conjecture, wrap it in words and call it a truth and chastise anyone that doesn't agree. Great job there fellas.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2009, 07:33:27 PM by Ronin »

Stop arguing! We have the same basic beliefs so lets remain neutral. If you want to debate this lets do it over pm or in another topic. We should be preparing for the haters that are about to enter.

-argument removed to continue debate over pm-


If you want to continue this then lets do so in pm. Honestly I hate debating myself; we should debating skeptics and haters on this board, not each other.

Can you prove he didn't?
This is a fallacy, but okay I'll bite.
Sure, using logic.
You didn't directly answer my question if you could prove it, you just asked a question in response which is not an answer. Thus, with no backing to support your warrant, I have identified a fallacy thus your argument holds no ground. You also use circular reasoning thus is a double-wammy fallacy.

No kidding.

I didn't post anything here that was serious or not sarcastic, so really go figure when you want to start a religion debate and expect everyone to fall in line.
When you engage in an argument, even if it is illogical nonsense, it will be scrutinized.

I love how religion debates get started, by the feeling of wanting to argue something "more important than ones' self" and then basing all the "facts" on personal beliefs rather than maintaining that "greater importance" feeling which originally fueled the debate.

Then again it's all a bunch of bullstuff, idiots trying to elevate themselves in a vain attempt to look deep.
Ronin you have only stated Rhetoric, get some facts in here please.
« Last Edit: February 22, 2009, 07:35:48 PM by [GSF]Ghost »

I love how religion debates get started, by the feeling of wanting to argue something "more important than ones' self" and then basing all the "facts" on personal beliefs rather than maintaining that "greater importance" feeling which originally fueled the debate.

Then again it's all a bunch of bullstuff, idiots trying to elevate themselves in a vain attempt to look deep.

This argument wasn't about making myself feel more important, I just like to call out handicaps when I see them from across the street.

Facts about conjecture, you just made my day.

This argument wasn't about making myself feel more important, I just like to call out handicaps when I see them from across the street.
And I'm saying this applies to the people it applies to, nothing else.

Here's the real question, what the forget are you all arguing about?

I love how religion debates get started, by the feeling of wanting to argue something "more important than ones' self" and then basing all the "facts" on personal beliefs rather than maintaining that "greater importance" feeling which originally fueled the debate.

Then again it's all a bunch of bullstuff, idiots trying to elevate themselves in a vain attempt to look deep.

Actually, none of that happened here.

Some guy noticed that Iban said he hated Christians.  And then BOOM!

But  :cookie: for you for telling it like it was 1890.

Actually, none of that happened here.

Some guy noticed that Iban said he hated Christians.  And then BOOM!

But  :cookie: for you for telling it like it was 1890.
I was saying that in general, but good job in proving me right.

He does it without realizing it, which is so sad :(

Great stuff here, eh?

Quote
lol sorry, I really get into debates and I can't help it.
Let me say somethings real quick though:

Martin Luther went against Christianity, thus we have so many subdivisions.
And I meant cohesive with current events. Christianity is less present in today's society.

"Many scientists disagree with global warming."
What about the info I provided? Zero out of a large consensus disagreed. Scientists are being pressured to state otherwise to the public. The movie An Inconvenient Truth states this and provides more evidence. Yes scientists were afraid to loose their jobs, but that was when the idea of global warming was first emergent and the government saw it as a hoax.

"Saints, according to real Catholicism are people who have lived sin-free lives.  I am not referring to the emergent Church, I am referring to the Roman Catholic church.  Know your doctrine, unless you're not really a Catholic."
This is an unfair assumption; I know my doctrine. Catholics believe saints are people of great virtue.

If you want to continue this then lets do so in pm. Honestly I hate debating myself; we should debating skeptics and haters on this board, not each other.

Martin Luther was FOR Christianity.  The Roman Catholic Church was trying to sell forgiveness to make money!  They said Christ's death wasn't enough, you had to pay to be able to get into heaven!  They said that God can only be reached with a priest, when Jesus said "I am the way, the truth, and the life.  No one comes to the Father except through me."  They said that the virgin Mary was a deity!  They said that righteousness does not come by faith alone!

Martin Luther was against all those BLATANT HERESIES, and you say he was AGAINST CHRISTIANITY?

On global warming.

"Zero out of a large consensus..."

Did you even read what I just said?  That is manipulated data used to fuel a liberal agenda, which scientists are PAID to say.  You have been brain-washed to believe the "consensus".  Scientists don't want to lose funding from the liberal-controlled universities, so they say they agree with Global Warming.  I'm not talking about the government.

You're so called "info" is the real hoax.

Real NASA Satellite data has shown that the only increase in world temperature is by 3 ppm!  That's PARTS PER MILLION!