Author Topic: Argument with a family man  (Read 20965 times)

Who wants something up their ass anyways?

Girls.

Being gay isn't a choice. You can't decide who you like.

Being gay is stupid. Who wants something up their ass anyways?
Girls.

Being gay isn't a choice. You can't decide who you like.

lol hes right,  and i think its a loooottt more complex than just having the desire to have something up your ass -.-

Being gay is a genetic gene.. I don't support gay marriage, gays burn in hell.
« Last Edit: May 31, 2009, 03:45:00 PM by Maximum »

Being gay is stupid. Who wants something up their ass anyways?

Girls.

Being gay is a genetic gene.. I don't support gay marriage, gays burn in hell.

.......

You loving richard.

Being gay is a genetic gene.. I don't support gay marriage, gays burn in hell.
Hmm...if we punish based on a gene someone revives, that's just like punishing someone without blonde hair and blue eyes . . . sound familiar?


Being gay is a genetic gene.. I don't support gay marriage, gays burn in hell.
Haha.  You contradict your whole belief in Christianity by saying that.  Because Christianity considers homoloveuality to be a choice, then you have to believen that aspect, or you can't believen any aspect.  That's because the God presented within the bible states that you must believen the whole bible, therefore making the whole bible a paradox, if some things are outlawed by people's beliefs.

Hmm...if we punish based on a gene someone revives, that's just like punishing someone without blonde hair and blue eyes . . . sound familiar?
Lol

Hmm...if we punish based on a gene someone revives, that's just like punishing someone without blonde hair and blue eyes . . . sound familiar?

It all starts here...

 In this society where being gay is shunned upon (and for good reason), how do you expect a child to be raised by gay parents? The answer is: poorly. Stephen Nock, scholar of marriage at the University of Virginia, writes that every study on the subject of gay parenting "contained at least one fatal flaw," and "not a single one was conducted according to generally accepted standards of scientific research." Well well well, God did create Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve, didn't he? Other studies show that children raised by homoloveuals were more dissatisfied with their own gender, had homoloveual experiences more frequently, and suffered a greater rate of molestation by members of their families (Adolescence, 1996; Archives of loveual Behavior, 1986; American Sociological Review, 2001). So why the hell should we allow gays to be parents? So we can nurture more forgeted up children and create a vicious cycle of dissatisfied gay members of society? I'd hate to be around for that.

When a gay parent adopts a child, the gay parent influences gay opinion on the child. The cycle never stops.

EDIT: I am not Christian, I am Aeithiest.

You still haven't read what I wrote.  And what I wrote, is fact that your statements on adam and eve is incorrect.  Because a paradox can only exist within probability.

therefore making the whole bible a paradox
... what?
The Bible condemns using love for pleasure instead or reproduction. I am pretty sure that gaylove does not lead to babies, thus it is on the list of don'ts. It doesn't say you are not allowed to be homoloveual, just you shouldn't use love only for pleasure. This also means you cant forget a dog, masturbate, or use contraceptives. Meh, but that is not going to stop people of course. :P

Being married doesn't entitle you to have kids - I'm pretty sure gay people can adopt without being married.

Christianity apposes homoloveuality, not the idea that love is for pleasure.

Christianity apposes homoloveuality, not the idea that love is for pleasure.
Christianity as it is does appose it, however the Bible never says you can't be in love with another man. The Bible does specifically say no love for pleasure.