A sudden emurgence of christian nuts...

[Leafsoo7]

its just like the argument over the cup of the water. The optimist says half full, the pessimist says its half empty or the engineer says you chose the wrong cup to pour the water in to.

[Ad Bot]

[Niliscro]

That's exactly the problem, it's a lose-lose situation, the fundamental differences cause wars, and not being able to have these differences causes conflict too. Blarg, it's so illogical.

Except religion can have positive humanitarian aspects, so it's best to keep it.

[Meekl]

I'm a Christan. So what? Religion has no effect on how you act, except for the people who will go "OM*WT*BBQ U R NUT BLEEV IN GOD U R BANZ NAO" For making a comment about Jesus/God.

[Ryuu]

Im to lazy to read most of this thread. But im on team Atheist. Goodbye for now.

[Doorman]

I'm a Christan. So what? Religion has no effect on how you act, except for the people who will go "OM*WT*BBQ U R NUT BLEEV IN GOD U R BANZ NAO" For making a comment about Jesus/God.

Actually, if you follow your religion right, you will learn from it and have good morals, but that doesn't mean you have to go crazy with it.

[Ryuu]

Actually, if you follow your religion right, you will learn from it and have good morals, but that doesn't mean you have to go crazy with it.

Aslo.

[Inv3rted]

Except religion can have positive humanitarian aspects, so it's best to keep it.

Such as? Intolerance? Sanctioned hatred? Murder? Cool.

Also jsut end the atheism arguement please:

I won't end the argument because that's not the definition.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OozkaHxMvFA

To put it shortly, forget you. You just distorted the English language because of religion-influenced bias of false definitions.

Oh what a busy day...

Oh look at this long post, hmmm.
Ah, I see. Well, that's your belief. I say belief because you believe there is no god.
"ATEISM IS THE LACK OF BELIEF!" I know! You don't believe in any gods, therefore you believe the is no god! I'm not saying it's a religion, I'm

Nope. There is a difference between not having a belief in the Christian God and denying the existence of any creator entity. I personally do not believe in a creator entity, but I have not once denied it in this thread.

You are all terribly ignorant, and it saddens me.

You obviously lack knowledge in any field relevant to the study of the universe.

Denial is different from disbelief. You theists have an incredibly obvious hole in your logic right there.

[Makingblah]

I hate those Zealous kinds of religious people that try and force you to believe in their god.

My teacher tried that and I said no fu

[Ladios]

I won't end the argument because that's not the definition.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OozkaHxMvFA

To put it shortly, forget you. You just distorted the English language because of religion-influenced bias of false definitions.

Oh well I apologize for using the common term that everyone uses and the basic definition.
But just so you know, atheism is "anti-theism" is the beleif in "not a god" as that is the opposite of the beleif in a God which is theism.
"a" is a common prefix to mean "opposite" or "anti", example asymetrical. I know there are others but I am too blah to write more right now.
You cant argue the definition because thats exactly what the loving word is when you break it doesn.

Nope. There is a difference between not having a belief in the Christian God and denying the existence of any creator entity. I personally do not believe in a creator entity, but I have not once denied it in this thread. You're entire loving argument, the basis of this thread, is to try and exhibit a lack of existance for God. You keep providing "proofs that God doesnt exist".
I'm sorry but now you are just bullstuffting.

You are all terribly ignorant, and it saddens me. because i dont agree with you

You obviously lack knowledge in any field relevant to the study of the universe. as do you appearntly. Every time I mention somethign about the universe, or soemthing a scientist says, you say its not true because a sceintist said it
If we cant cite religious sources cause they are false, and scientists because they arn't religious, what else are we to use to argue with. You leave no oppertunity for and defense as everything we say you ignore the credibility.

Denial is different from disbelief. You theists have an incredibly obvious hole in your logic right there. Please explain this note further

[WhatevaGuy]

I just realilzed the sickness of the title...

[Tingalz]

ffffffff

[Inv3rted]

"loving argument, the basis of this thread, is to try and exhibit a lack of existance for God. You keep providing "proofs that God doesnt exist".
I'm sorry but now you are just bullstuffting."

A hole in my previous post's logic was that I stated that we cannot comprehend things and so we can not deem them to be impossible. You say that God is incomprehendable.

What I forgot to mention was that the way God is described in the Bible is simply impossible. A creator entity can not be disproven, but the biblical god can.

How can I disprove the God you believe in? (not all deities, just the specific omnipotent one that spread the most foul stuff on our species)

Quite simple.

My point is still valid. Your scientific evidence is evidence for my argument, not yours. That's why I tell you not to use it.

You obviously lack the patience to carefully think about your points, and it is shown by your myriad of errors caused by rushed typing. Think about what you say.

[Robo Noob]

Athiesm you say?

[Zaran]

evil exists as choosing "not God"

Riddler was catholic.  Catholics believe in god.  Riddler was evil.  By your own logic, Riddler could not have been a catholic.

[Doorman]

Riddler was catholic.  Catholics believe in god.  Riddler was evil.  By your own logic, Riddler could not have been a catholic.

Actually, Riddler, in a sense, was not evil. He was a fundamentalist all the way. A fundamentalist believes that everyone that is not in their religion is going to Hell. So, him believing this, thought that they are going to Hell anyways. Why not kill them all?

Obviously, many people did not like this.