Author Topic: Block Builder- The Atheist friend.  (Read 4665 times)

I thought you didn't sign in Off-Topic.

I thought you didn't sign in Off-Topic.

I'm terribly sorry but whoohps, it slipped through. Biggie, I've made ah jolly tadgah up.

Science says life on Earth was a freak accident. That it too just happened. So it's possible to support your opening sentence.

Science says no such thing. We know very little about abiogenesis, but it has been shown that electrical charge can cause simpler molecules to form into amino acids. This is only the beginning, and there is a much smaller chance that a super complex God happened completely by chance than a few molecules doing basic interactions.

Honestly, I believe Science gives a better explanation to the beginning of time than Religion.

Honestly, I believe Science gives a better explanation to the beginning of time than Religion.
exactly


Science says no such thing. We know very little about abiogenesis, but it has been shown that electrical charge can cause simpler molecules to form into amino acids. This is only the beginning, and there is a much smaller chance that a super complex God happened completely by chance than a few molecules doing basic interactions.
True, we don't know much. But the freak chances of the specific amounts of amino acids that collected in one pool and the rarity of 10,000 average lightning strikes a day (considering those stayed constant over the last 6 billion years) and how technically the atmosphere of the Earth at the time was too toxic for those amino acids to survive, short of being near sulfur vents at the bottoms of oceans which means lightning couldn't strike it...needless to say, a lot of variables of chance are in this and a lot of them are astronomically rare. They had a special about the formation of life on the History channel some time ago, no later than a month ago. It was actually very riveting to watch.

If all of that was so common, then why aren't we able to find more clear and definite signs life on other planets or fossils of life on other planets. Granted scientists are still debating the Mars bacteria at the moment.

It COULD be on the other side of the galaxy or in another galaxy.

If there is no God, then where did the universe come from? It had to start with matter, but matter can not be created nor destroyed, and that matter had to come into existence somehow, but according to science, that's impossible. So there must be a creator of some kind, that exists outside of time and space, otherwise the existence of the universe and matter itself would be impossible.

Yes, I know that because of this post I will be insulted and thought of as a handicap by others, and I do not care. Please actually consider this post seriously and know that insulting me isn't going to change anything.
The universe started as an infinitely dense mass, possibly created by a black hole, or produced by a universe within a multiverse brushing up against a second universe. It was also proven that the universe's creation was solved with 11 dimensions and the multiverse.

people who are preachy about their religion are more annoying than people who genuinely think about things within their knowledge of science, so I con't think it's necessary for insults.

The universe started as an infinitely dense mass, possibly created by a black hole, or produced by a universe within a multiverse brushing up against a second universe. It was also proven that the universe's creation was solved with 11 dimensions and the multiverse.

people who are preachy about their religion are more annoying than people who genuinely think about things within their knowledge of science, so I con't think it's necessary for insults.
I didn't know proof could include theoretical science.

look at all the arguing you guys are doing. i just don't care if there is or is not a god(s).

I didn't know proof could include theoretical science.

I didn't know proof included a simple book.

Hey guys.
There is no proof of anything.

* Matt runs away cackling madly.

Really all this is about is somebody's opinion, who gives a crap, their loss...

True, we don't know much. But the freak chances of the specific amounts of amino acids that collected in one pool and the rarity of 10,000 average lightning strikes a day (considering those stayed constant over the last 6 billion years) and how technically the atmosphere of the Earth at the time was too toxic for those amino acids to survive, short of being near sulfur vents at the bottoms of oceans which means lightning couldn't strike it...needless to say, a lot of variables of chance are in this and a lot of them are astronomically rare. They had a special about the formation of life on the History channel some time ago, no later than a month ago. It was actually very riveting to watch.

If all of that was so common, then why aren't we able to find more clear and definite signs life on other planets or fossils of life on other planets. Granted scientists are still debating the Mars bacteria at the moment.

What? Amino acids don't need sulfur to survive. They are molecules, not alive. The point is that it has been shown that amino acids could be more easily formed than originally thought, and amino acids are the base unit of proteins. Electrical charges hitting large pools of water are conducted, spreading the electricity and therefore increasing the odds of being hit by the charge.