Right, so, pretty much Liquid mentions how he believes that the Lower ID's are better builders than the Higher ID's. Now, I'm not going to disagree with the fact that, there are some very good high ID Builders. However, from the way that I read Liquids words, it would seem that he's saying that almost all Low ID's are better than Higher ID's.
I can see where this comes from, with the concept of "Longer Playing=More Practice=More Experience=Better Builds" But even so, I have personally met high ID's who are equivalent or better than ID's lower than themselves, lower than myself, and even lower than Liquid, himself.
Now, Liquid also mentions that there is a strong correlation of good builders with low ID's compated to higher ID's. I personally find that (Removing the newbs, who don't yet know how to play the game completely/to their best ability) But I say, that there is an equal number of players who are good builders, and high ID's as their are Low ID's. I also stated that;
If you were to get a list of every BL_ID active, and get one of their best builds, and get a non-biased judge, to judge every single one, based on certain criteria, I could assure you, any Graph created would have slight correlation at the lower ID's, but it would be spread fast there. It would be equal so, in every single ID Range. The only time it wouldn't be, is when it's a new person, who doesn't know how to play the game.
And, I believe that to be true.
If there's anything I've said in there, that sounds controversial, or questionable, then please, feel free to correct me on it. Just, don't go Ape-stuff on me, because I wrote something in a slightly bad context.
Poll