Author Topic: Obama signs gays into hate-crime bill  (Read 8579 times)

My mom removed me out of a christian school because I hated it.

I was getting sick of the "POWER RANGERS IS SATAN", and the "UR GOING TO HELL" crap.
« Last Edit: October 28, 2009, 08:49:41 PM by koolkody12 »

I don't see how people can be gay, not because of the love with men or w/e, but because don't they fear too much brown town love will lead to their ass being so stretched out they have to wear a crap bag because they can't hold it in?

I'm against homoloveuality myself. Homoloveuals are parasites of the state in the sense that they don't produce children  to become strong workers/soldiers and future child bearers. They serve no purpose into the continuation of our society.

As well as just being aberrations of nature.

You say you're against homoloveuality, but you think those people can be together and do things together... The last paragraph only tells me that you don't like it, not that you are against it. To be agaisnt something is to fight back and say it is wrong.

I just don't believe in it, but i guess i'm not the kinda person who wants to run in on some guys but secks and get him to stop because it's against MY religion. If someone came up to me and said, "hey i'm thinking of going gay, what do you have to say about that". Well of course i would tell him i don't condone it, and i would explain to him why and tell him what I believe. And of course, i would listen to what he has to say. I can't control him and be like "Hey no snake and butt for you mister". I'm also not a politician, and i can't stand politics, i guess thats why i just wanna let the gays have their rights because i don't wanna get involved in all the political bull stuff that gets thrown around. And in my mind, i guess i don't see that being against something means fighting back.

Maybe it's just me. But i could care less what some Homoloveual guy does with his Homoloveual buddy. It's not my business, and i don't care to make it my business. 

I'm against homoloveuality myself. Homoloveuals are parasites of the state in the sense that they don't produce children  to become strong workers/soldiers and future child bearers. They serve no purpose into the continuation of our society.

As well as just being aberrations of nature.

They do adopt and raise children though, and I dunno if there is any research proof that they raise kids better, but you do hear stories often of an adopted child of gay people being a super genius or had a multimillion dollar idea. So a gay person's adopted baby will more likely than not be 10x more important to society than any straight person's baby.

My mom removed me out of a christian school because I hated it.

I was getting sick of the "POWER RANGERS IS SATAN", and the "UR GOING TO HELL" crap.
I brought Cup Cakes that had plastic rings that had power ranger stickers on them to my christian preschool when I was young, such a fun birthday party I had that day.

I brought Cup Cakes that had plastic rings that had power ranger stickers on them to my christian preschool when I was young, such a fun birthday party I had that day.

Because you get a cup cake, a ring, AND a power ranger sticker.

I brought Cup Cakes that had plastic rings that had power ranger stickers on them to my christian preschool when I was young, such a fun birthday party I had that day.
Extremely lucky.

I'm against homoloveuality myself. Homoloveuals are parasites of the state in the sense that they don't produce children to become strong workers/soldiers and future child bearers. They serve no purpose into the continuation of our society.

As well as just being aberrations of nature.
As Visage said, they do adopt, but that doesn't mean they can't produce babies of their own. They just can't do it naturally, or in other words, between the two partners. And, in my opinion, gay parents are much better parents because they are far more prepared for a baby than a regular straight couple would be, seeing as they are more prepared, financially and knowledge wise that is.

The people themselves are not aberrations of nature, it is what we do that does not follow the "norm."

Extremely lucky.
Why?

Also I remember reading somewhere that there was this place in southern california that made artificial loveual organs for gay men to produce childeren.

So homoloveuality is a religion now?

Basically, your telling me that homoloveuals must have the right of denying the rights of clergymen.  Can you tell me what's wrong with that picture?


Also, I don't believe that homoloveuality is caused by genetics either.  Actually, quite a few things that are normally attributed to genetics have been shown to be caused by a variety of other things.  I think this is another one of those cases.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preformation_theory so you believe in this then? You're a loving idiot.


Why?

Also I remember reading somewhere that there was this place in southern california that made artificial loveual organs for gay men to produce childeren.

Now thats wrong.

And, in my opinion, gay parents are much better parents because they are far more prepared for a baby than a regular straight couple would be, seeing as they are more prepared, financially and knowledge wise that is.
I'd like to know your reasoning.

Ample amounts of intelligent hard working people are born and cared for. What we need more of is less intelligent people who can be bread as soldiers. People who can do grunt work and are expendable to promote the better people in the country.

I'm against homoloveuality myself. Homoloveuals are parasites of the state in the sense that they don't produce children  to become strong workers/soldiers and future child bearers. They serve no purpose into the continuation of our society.

As well as just being aberrations of nature.
Otis da starfish, no?