I really do like this game but I really was expecting it to pop up on that list. Just because most of the game is based off of mythology or religion. If I am correct you can get a persona called "Satan" and "Lucifer".
Unfortunately, you couldn't get a Jesus persona or anything like that in this game, the closest thing you could get was a weird guy with a boombox in his pelvis called Messiah. It made up for it by having a bad guy that looks like Jesus and shoots people with a 44 magnum though. Also Lucifer was the best persona so I guess you were a satanist or something.
I don't doubt that that is accepted by the scientific community. what the question was asking is if energy can not be created or destroyed, what could generate the amount of energy required in order to cause such a massive explosion of ultra-dense particles that is still causing the expansion of the universe as we know it?
Yet scientists have indeed done 4 different examples of pre big bang universes and no one scoffs at those. They can't agree on either of them, but when a supernatural being comes into the mix. Nope, can't be right, even though we still have as of yet to determine if there is any life out there that hasn't evolved waaaaay before us, we'll just assume we're the superior intellect in the universe and everything we say has to be the final answer.
I'm so tired of Human arrogance and their need to be the ultimate power over everything they observe.
Look, let me point out why god isn't part of Mathematical models. God is a logical error. First off, for something to exist, it needs to be within our physical universe. Simplest rule there is, if it's not in our universe it does not exist, this is stating nothing else and nothing new. Now then,
Saying god made everything loops back to the question: who made god? Did god make himself?
Saying god always existed provides it's own set of logic traps: it suggests the universe existed before it's creation since, for a being to exist within a universe, the universe already needs to be present. There was nowhere to exist in before the universe was created. He wasn't allowed to pop up and spark his magic to make our universe, he had nowhere to pop up, he'd need to be inside the very thing he created before creating it in order to exist within it. I guess this answers the previous question, God made himself, but with the added twist of creating himself before he existed.
Saying God can exist when he wants to and can't when he wants to leaves us with the startling realization that his non-existence would simultaneously require the universe to cease to exist, since his existence pends on the creation of the universe to ascertain his existence. If god would ever wish to cease to exist, he would cause his preexisting self to never create the universe in the first place in order to Not exist. So God isn't allowed to live in the middle grounds of existence, either he's around or he's not and it's a rule that's always in effect. Let's keep going.
Saying God is omnipotent is a handy excuse for "stuff he can do whatever the forget he wants quit questioning him". Anyways opinions aside, the problem with omnipotence is the following: He's allowed to do anything he wants and has infinite knowledge at his disposal to justify his actions, is it sustainable in our logic-based universe? Omnipotence requires a sketchy value of Infinite. With infinite power comes a few rules: You can either have infinite potential to act or infinite potential and infinite action simultaneously (infinite is infinite within our universe). You cannot be omnipotent without infinite potential, since omnipotence IS infinite potential.
Existentially omnipotence requires that once you start acting that you never stop acting until you hit some barrier of infinite potential in order to stop you (Everything has to hit some sort of wall eventually, thermodynamics says so). So God would act out infinity forever if he were to ever act even once. Maybe God could stop himself but it would require him to act, creating another infinite action paradox. He could create another self which would itself be infinite potential and action, God would have to create himself in order to act. Another problem is the moment a being of infinite potential acts, his actions have infinite meaning within our universe and cannot be quantified, but that's just details. Saying he could act in "short bursts" still makes no sense either, if you take a piece of infinite, it's infinite. You can't quantize infinite, in other words you can't cut it down!
If we tie everything together, taking into account that God is omnipotent, can/can't exist when he wishes, always exists, and that he created the universe, it comes down to a huge ass logical error in that when God acts he needs to create another god to stop him from acting forever, simultaneously recreating the universe in order for this god to be brought from non-existence to existence, and that to cease to exist would simultaneously cause him to Act thus recreating himself and the universe to exist in order for him to stop existing, and it just goes on and on and on.
Keep in mind I made only one scientific assumption here, the Thermodynamic one (which is actually logical if you payed close attention), and I played fair and used all the rules I keep hearing about how he operates.
The universe makes more sense without God, not the other way around.
