Poll

Are you...

Politically Pro-Life
1 (5.3%)
Politically Pro-Choice
5 (26.3%)
Both Politically and personally Pro-Life
1 (5.3%)
Both Politically and personally Pro-Choice
12 (63.2%)

Total Members Voted: 19

Author Topic: Abortion  (Read 2025 times)

If a mother aborts, she might as well stab one of her own born children. It's as wrong as any child murder I know.
This is really absurd. Why would you kill a born and living child along with an aborted pregnancy? What need is there to kill off two things?

What if a women has an unwanted pregnancy? Why should she be forced to have one just because its a baby, really we have enough people in the world for women to have the choice.

Its a hard subject. In poor areas. A lady gets pregnat but she doesn't want to bring another child to die on the streets at 3 because of no food. So she gets an abortion. It has pro's and cons.

Even though they are connected, is the baby really PART of her body?
Try reading the second part of my post to see my view on this.

Instead of calling the thing growing inside the woman a baby, lets call it a fetus.

Or a zygote if you can abort within a few seconds.

 :cookieMonster:

This is really absurd. Why would you kill a born and living child along with an aborted pregnancy? What need is there to kill off two things?
What I meant was a baby isfetus (my apologies sir skele) living regardless of whether it's inside it's mother or outside.

Try reading the second part of my post to see my view on this.
Okay, but which one, there are like 3 that quote me... ill probably figure out before you post though, so nevermind

Okay, but which one, there are like 3 that quote me... ill probably figure out before you post though, so nevermind
I don't know man, I only made one post before you asked that question. Try that one...

What I meant was a baby isfetus (my apologies sir skele) living regardless of whether it's inside it's mother or outside.
A flower is living, too.

The fetus is more like a parasite than anything else.

What I meant was a baby isfetus (my apologies sir skele) living regardless of whether it's inside it's mother or outside.

So a life of suffering is infinitely better than not being conscious ever?

Your logic is outstandingly pathetic.

Who said your life would be full of suffering? Your logic is not being shown at all in this thread.

Who said your life would be full of suffering? Your logic is not being shown at all in this thread.

I'm giving you an example of a possible life. What's your point, again?

Who said your life would be full of suffering? Your logic is not being shown at all in this thread.
Chances are, your mom wouldn't want you if she wanted an abortion in the first place.

POSSIBLE life. It's not like because she chose not to abort that the child will suffer. His/her life is dependent on his or her choices, the quality of their life has nothing to do with this. YOUR point?

Oh har, marcem decided to come in with inverted and gangrape me :D

Chances are, your mom wouldn't want you if she wanted an abortion in the first place.

Exactly. Obviously a mother who isn't prepared to have a baby will abort. That would save the baby, more than anything.

At any rate, it's just a bunch of human cells. Is bleeding illegal now, too? That's killing human cells from inside your body.

POSSIBLE life. It's not like because she chose not to abort that the child will suffer. His/her life is dependent on his or her choices, the quality of their life has nothing to do with this. YOUR point?

Oh har, marcem decided to come in with inverted and gangrape me :D

Not the sharpest knife on the Hanukkah tree, eh?