Project: Inverted 180 degree fsjal with fwoosh mirrored

[A.R.C.]

Are you at all surprised?

Can't say I am.

1) Figure of speech.  I understand you here.
Indeed
2) Time to break it down.
Hammer time.
I'm guessing you mean it is a cover-up for something 'bad'?
Indeed.
  I'm not understanding you here, but if you think it's a cover-up for something bad you're wrong. 
You're wrong here as well. It refers to the impact of the meaning being weak.
 Do you mean we target certain individuals and pull them in?
We? No. I do.
3) Poor attempt at an insult.  Do better next time.
Never said it was an insult.
Ignorance is the truest for of happiness.
If I am wrong, correct me.
Word.

Quooooote vorteeeeeex

You seem to say that whenever we dissect your arguments.
We? As in your gay lover picks his arguments by throwing darts at a wall with sentences on them and then you stroke his phallus?
 I see three possibilities.
You don't see, you're blind.
A. You lie about us misinterpreting it, because your argument is terrible.
As is yours.

B. You purposely make it so we won't understand, so you can call us stupid and "win".
That is how you win debates.
_{^{Or a cheap way to win.}}

C. You're self-contradictory, and say it ways you think we'll understand, while at the same time calling us stupid.
Nope.

[Ad Bot]

[WhatevaGuy]

You seem to have it in your mind that Wynd is gay--that I am gay--and this is undoubtedly false.
The proof is in evidence that if I have ever said I was gay for him I either a) didn't know what it meant or b) was joking around.  What's more, you seem to have it in your mind that 'gay' is an even remotely good insult.  Once again, incorrect.
On letter 'B' you say that's how you win debates, then immediately follow up by saying that it's a 'cheap way to win.'  Did you just prove him right?

And, thank you for correcting me.  But by 'we' I meant FA, not you.  Why would you be pulling people in, and to what?

And, how did you imply ignorance?  I saw nothing of the sort there; it seemed as if you were telling me that I wouldn't understand you at all and that it was pointless--insult, methinks.

[Wynd_Fox]

Quooooote vorteeeeeex

What's a phallus? I'm not gay, nor is WhatevaGuy, as far as I know. And you admitted that you purposely word it inexplicably annoyingly just so you can dance around and say how much smarter you are.

[A.R.C.]

You seem to have it in your mind that Wynd is gay--that I am gay--and this is undoubtedly false.
The proof is in evidence that if I have ever said I was gay for him I either a) didn't know what it meant or b) was joking around.  What's more, you seem to have it in your mind that 'gay' is an even remotely good insult.  Once again, incorrect.

Good cover.

On number 'B' you say that's how you win debates, then immediately follow up by saying that it's a 'cheap way to win.'  Did you just prove him right?

Sure.

And, thank you for correcting me.  But by 'we' I meant FA, not you.  Why would you be pulling people in, and to what?

To the statement, and as a diversion.

And, how did you imply ignorance?  I saw nothing of the sort there; it seemed as if you were telling me that I wouldn't understand you at all and that it was pointless--insult, methinks.

La la la la can't hear you.

[WhatevaGuy]

Did you just prove me completely right?

First, you simply restate your idea of my loveuality--that of a false one.
Then, you agree with me.
Admit you were trying to throw me off track.
And completely ignore an intelligible point.

Nice.

[A.R.C.]

Considering Number B comment was asking if I agreed with what I already agreed with, the only think that was agreeable side for the last comment, which was answered by a form of ignorance reflecting what I had said.

[Sirrus]

Holy stuff, are you guys going to co-write a thesis on this?

[WhatevaGuy]

Considering Number B comment was asking if I agreed with what I already agreed with, the only think that was agreeable side for the last comment, and last statement was a form of ignorance reflecting what I had said.

Letter

And about 25% of that post made no sense whatsoever.

[Wynd_Fox]

It was convolution wrapped in confusion, with a typo that threw me off for a few seconds.

[Cucumber!]

Stomp on your right foot, DON'T FORGET IT!

[WhatevaGuy]

It was convolution wrapped in confusion, with a typo that threw me off for a few seconds.

'the only think'
Heehee.

Also, in his quote he changed one of my words so I said 'number B' instead of letter.
That was no accident.

[Wynd_Fox]

Stomp on your right foot, DON'T FORGET IT!

If you're not going to make sense, go away.

[WhatevaGuy]

If you're not going to make sense, go away.

Isn't that from Phineas and Ferb?
The aglet thing?
Or am I being crazy.

[Wynd_Fox]

The heck is Phineas and Ferb?

[A.R.C.]

Holy stuff, are you guys going to co-write a thesis on this?

I'm just taking all the credit in the end.

Letter

That's the joke.

And about 25% of that post made no sense whatsoever.

Mmm, poor wording.

The first one (being _{^{On number 'B' you say that's how you win debates, then immediately follow up by saying that it's a 'cheap way to win.'  Did you just prove him right?}}) was followed by a sure because that was the point of the comment. Then you asked if I said yes, which I had already done, and throwing you off track is yet another dirty tactic. Doing what I must, because I can.

And the last statment (Lalalalala and stuff) Was reflecting on my ignorance is the happiness wordswordswords because with such ignorance one would become self content.

Tell me, would you rather be smart, or happy?