entrepreneur my gun

[plad101]

anyone like my Remington 860? (its a shotgun rifle thing i wanted to make a shotgun XD)

[Ad Bot]

[Messes]

Oh my

Here comes the white knight.

This thread may not be a "Design a weapon that will work and has no flaws whatsoever, any imperfections deem you an idiot" thread, but when some dipstuff comes in with a totally broken gun and acts like it would work then they're a loving moron. Go away and quit sticking up for these asshats. This thread isn't fun when people create guns that look like complete ass and try to act like they would work.

You fail to realize who I'm talking to. Look up, look at the kids posts towards guns, and see. Nop.avi. Lets just jump on Meeses.

Of course I am sticking up for them, idiot. Or am I missing some rule board you are reading where it says "All guns must work 100% and totally be realistic in every manner or they will get flamed". Nop.avi

Someone can make a gun for their own enjoyment. Apparently I've noticed the DEFAULT guns with just an added mag, scope, and barrel get more attention than the people who are actually CREATIVE and do something out of the ordinary that looks a whole lot better than some piece of stuff half-assed work of adding attachments.

[Qwepir]

You fail to realize who I'm talking to. Look up, look at the kids posts towards guns, and see. Nop.avi. Lets just jump on Meeses.

I saw his posts. I agree with them.

Of course I am sticking up for them, idiot. Or am I missing some rule board you are reading where it says "All guns must work 100% and totally be realistic in every manner or they will get flamed". Nop.avi

Do I bash every gun that doesn't look like it would work 100%? No. That's stupid. What I do bash are the dipstuffs that make "supr awesome smg snipers accurate to 50000 fete!" and guns that are grenade launcher/scope spam or have a ton of horrible overlapping. You want me to bash a weapon that doesn't look 100% plausible? Fine. I'll do that right now.

It looks like you just put the clip in the body of the gun, there's no ejection port, horrible overlapping on the bipod, that knife looks loving stupid with 3 midgets sticking out of it, the color scheme looks terribad, and there's a bunch of holes in it.

Someone can make a gun for their own enjoyment. Apparently I've noticed the DEFAULT guns with just an added mag, scope, and barrel get more attention than the people who are actually CREATIVE and do something out of the ordinary that looks a whole lot better than some piece of stuff half-assed work of adding attachments.

I've noticed that too, which is why I ignore those plagiarists altogether.

[RAMIREZ!YaSuck!]

I saw his posts. I agree with them.
Do I bash every gun that doesn't look like it would work 100%? No. That's stupid. What I do bash are the dipstuffs that make "supr awesome smg snipers accurate to 50000 fete!" and guns that are grenade launcher/scope spam or have a ton of horrible overlapping. You want me to bash a weapon that doesn't look 100% plausible? Fine. I'll do that right now.It looks like you just put the clip in the body of the gun, there's no ejection port, horrible overlapping on the bipod, that knife looks loving stupid with 3 midgets sticking out of it, the color scheme looks terribad, and there's a bunch of holes in it.
I've noticed that too, which is why I ignore those plagiarists altogether.

Holy forget dude just calm down, it's a game not a real gun building simulator.

[WingZero]

Holy forget dude just calm down, it's a game not a real gun building simulator.

What Qwepir is trying to say is that most people's guns in this thread are terribly proportioned, no use of overlapping, unrealistically long mags, guns firing bullets with the cartridge stuck to it, "compact snipers" for "run and gun", grenade spamming, unrealistic stats (ex: OGM RELY ACCURET GOS 8549086903486 FET), and the gun wouldn't have a chance in hell. Basically, it's terrible.

If someone made a gun that had the barrel upside down, then Qwepir can complain about it if he wants.

[Shinji]

Barrett M125

Sidearm:



Beretta m10 suppressed.

And one more thing for all you kiddies out there that don't know your guns:



I used an M4 to demonstrate what it's supposed to look like when you're firing a gun. You don't just put bullet AND cartridge on front of the muzzleflash. Ungroup them, then put the cartridge near where the dust cover is. It should look something like this. I know I messed up a bit on the positions of the bullets.

[hotshot87]

awsomeness

[chaseyqurt]

What Qwepir is trying to say is that most people's guns in this thread are terribly proportioned, no use of overlapping, unrealistically long mags, guns firing bullets with the cartridge stuck to it, "compact snipers" for "run and gun", grenade spamming, unrealistic stats (ex: OGM RELY ACCURET GOS 8549086903486 FET), and the gun wouldn't have a chance in hell. Basically, it's terrible.

If someone made a gun that had the barrel upside down, then Qwepir can complain about it if he wants.

He's just being a whinny bitch at this point, no one wants to hear his hear his criticism.

[RAMIREZ!YaSuck!]

What Qwepir is trying to say is that most people's guns in this thread are terribly proportioned, no use of overlapping, unrealistically long mags, guns firing bullets with the cartridge stuck to it, "compact snipers" for "run and gun", grenade spamming, unrealistic stats (ex: OGM RELY ACCURET GOS 8549086903486 FET), and the gun wouldn't have a chance in hell. Basically, it's terrible.

If someone made a gun that had the barrel upside down, then Qwepir can complain about it if he wants.

Ummm, making barrel upside down does nothing.

[Shinji]

I added a demonstration of a gun firing so you loving idiots wouldn't post the gun shooting the whole cartridge & bullet out at the same time.

[Qwepir]

If someone made a gun that had the barrel upside down, then Qwepir can complain about it if he wants.

I wouldn't complain about that though, because an upside down barrel looks pretty much the same.

[Demitiri]

I made the thundergun :D

[TheScout]

Holy shat

[RAMIREZ!YaSuck!]

And one more thing for all you kiddies out there that don't know your guns:



I used an M4 to demonstrate what it's supposed to look like when you're firing a gun. You don't just put bullet AND cartridge on front of the muzzleflash. Ungroup them, then put the cartridge near where the dust cover is. It should look something like this. I know I messed up a bit on the positions of the bullets.

The dust cover should be open, it cant eject shells like that. Phail.

p.s too small flash

[e-maxx]

please tell me how you know what a gun's muzzle flash looks like