Author Topic: MAG  (Read 6079 times)





wut?


What do you mean "wut?". You honestly think that MAG's graphics, are better then BFBC2?

I've been playing a lot lately. Blockland clan anyone?

What do you mean "wut?". You honestly think that MAG's graphics, are better then BFBC2?
I'm pretty sure you said BF2, not BFBC2.

MAGs graphics are pretty loving good, considering the amount of stuff going on at once.

MAGs graphics are pretty loving good, considering the amount of stuff going on at once.
The only graphical problem I see here is they sky box. Ugh it's disgusting

I entered a contest for a $5000 dollar Target Gift Card. Win it, and I'm buying a PS3 and this. What is MAG rated? T?

I entered a contest for a $5000 dollar Target Gift Card. Win it, and I'm buying a PS3 and this. What is MAG rated? T?
Yep.

Thought so. Wish me luck. The contest ended today. I hope I won.

MAGs graphics are pretty loving good, considering the amount of stuff going on at once.

Is it like as big as the maps on battlefield2?

Is it like as big as the maps on battlefield2?
As big or bigger.


THE PLAYSTATION 3 HAS NO GAMES

*looks at playstation 3*
WAIT WHAT?!
MAG is not a game.
It's a incredibly great design for a DVD menu.

Also, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZP98WusJd8
That video makes me not want to buy it.

The graphics look terrible in my opinion and the lighting is completely unrealistic. (Compared to other games of the time, MW2 etc)
« Last Edit: January 31, 2010, 10:39:36 PM by MtnDew »

MAG is not a game.
It's a incredibly great design for a DVD menu.

Also, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZP98WusJd8
That video makes me not want to buy it.

The graphics look terrible in my opinion and the lighting is completely unrealistic. (Compared to other games of the time, MW2 etc)

*cough cough* idiot Pandan buy it!!!

No, I got MAG two days ago and it wrecks.  Sure, MWII is faster-paced, but between the explosions, deaths, reviving capabilities, 253 person battlegrounds, parachuting from the sky, and commanding your peoples, MAG is easily more realistic, and makes you feel like you are really in a battle. 

9.5/10 from me.

What do you mean "wut?". You honestly think that MAG's graphics, are better then BFBC2?
Are you loving dumb?

I said "Battlefield 2". I meant Battlefield 2. I did not say "Battlefield Bad Company 2" I did not mean Battlefield Bad Company 2.

Actually I had to have agreed with everything that guy said when I first started but once I got used to it, especially in the later game modes, leadership is a big issue (when the forgeters actually listen to your orders) and team work soemtimes comes into play. But its liek CoD though in that it depends who is on your squad, if they are going to be cooperative. In CoD I rarely had team mates that did anything besides try to rack up kills when teamwork could be used and it would be more fun.
It's an error in human nature moreso in my opinion.
I never play as a sniper so I don't really notice anything on that issue.
The art style I don't pay attention to while playing, though at one point in a game I was taking cover from sniper fire and noticed how incredibly interesting the concrete barrier I was hiding behind looked. The way the light hit it and the grass under me and the ocean in the distance, it all looked rather real. I was snapped out of this when the loving sniper managed to flank me and I had to shoot him in the head but still, it was quite an interesting realization when I finally noticed how far graphics have come.