Money...

[LegendZ]

Which is impossible...
If someone gets something extra, everyone else would get the feel that they need the extra.

[Ad Bot]

[Gamefandan]

If it is human nature to have more than their neighbor, then humanity itself is the issue.

[Wynd_Fox]

People can't live solo you idiot.

[Gamefandan]

People can't live solo you idiot.

I never implied that people have to live in solitude.

[Jacob/Lee]

[Bisjac]

Is this even possible for humans.

sure.

but it will take many many generations and alot of work to untrain the world into wanting to be better then everyone else lol

[Wynd_Fox]

I never implied that people have to live in solitude.

I mean in like just a family. That has never worked well.

[dkamm65]

All and all, your entire statement is babies.

So if a man needs milk, he has to raise his own cows?

And if he needs medicine, he has to build his own lab?

Or if he needs clothes for his children, he has to grow his own cotton and sew them himself?

Or lets say this, he has a blanket he weaved, but he doesn't need it. He has to trade it for something he does need, lets say milk. He has to trade it to the man who produces milk. Simple enough.

But what if he doesn't need a blanket? The man with the blanket is stuff out of luck. Unless of course he could sell the blanket he made to somebody who needs one for MONEY. Then he can give the MONEY to the milk man, and the milk man can use the MONEY to buy what he needs.

And as bisjac said, any time you trade something it takes on the role of currency.

It's pretty obvious you have no loving clue what you're talking about.

[PJ Boy]

You people seem to miss the big picture. Do humans need money to survive in general. Think about it.

[dkamm65]

You people seem to miss the big picture. Do humans need money to survive in general. Think about it.

YES. How else are we supposed to get our necessities?

[Jacob/Lee]

You people seem to miss the big picture. Do humans need money to survive in general. Think about it.

In today's society, yes. In 10000 B.C.E (for non god believers) no.

[Gamefandan]

So if a man needs milk, he has to raise his own cows?

And if he needs medicine, he has to build his own lab?

Or if he needs clothes for his children, he has to grow his own cotton and sew them himself?

Or lets say this, he has a blanket he weaved, but he doesn't need it. He has to trade it for something he does need, lets say milk. He has to trade it to the man who produces milk. Simple enough.

But what if he doesn't need a blanket? The man with the blanket is stuff out of luck. Unless of course he could sell the blanket he made to somebody who needs one for MONEY. Then he can give the MONEY to the milk man, and the milk man can use the MONEY to buy what he needs.

And as bisjac said, any time you trade something it takes on the role of currency.

It's pretty obvious you have no loving clue what you're talking about.

The point is that currency is good, trade is good, milk is good, but the system using invisible currency is bad. If there was some way that we could bring back survival of the fittest without first getting rid of money, then please, enlighten me.

[MtnDew]

You people seem to miss the big picture. Do humans need money to survive in general. Think about it.

Obviously not.

We need it to sustane life in the modern world as we know it.
Exchange for food, water, shelter.
Etc.

[Wynd_Fox]

Why are you so convinced survival of the fittest is good?

[dkamm65]

The point is that currency is good, trade is good, milk is good, but the system using invisible currency is bad. If there was some way that we could bring back survival of the fittest without first getting rid of money, then please, enlighten me.

And what makes you think survival of the fittest needs to come back?