Dual-Monitor Displays

[Miga]

Oh, and I forgot to mention, I had two monitors before, but that was a long time back (2007). I had to sacrifice one of them for my Mac Mini in a different room. Plus, the other one won't fit on this desk, I'd have to get a new desk to dual-monitor it up.

[Ad Bot]

[tails]

Human eyes can see infinite frames, The only reason the whole 24 bullstuff is around is because it's what TV uses.

If you play a game at 25fps and then jump up to 60fps, You WILL notice a difference.

[steve5451]

Human eyes can see infinite frames, The only reason the whole 24 bullstuff is around is because it's what TV uses.

If you play a game at 25fps and then jump up to 60fps, You WILL notice a difference.

Not necessarily.
Wave your hand infront of your face.
See that blur?
That's your eyes not capturing your hands fast enough.
Our eyes don't use frames, but if they did, it would be pretty high.


On Topic:
I have a 20 inch monitor sitting on top of my XBox 360 (No PS3 cigarettes, plz) for gaming. I don't even watch TV.
But anyway, sometimes I plug my laptop into that. I don't have the chord to my camera right now, so I'll just do a Prnt Screen to give you the basic idea of what it looks like.

[fawkes..]

Better pics! :)
-SNIPETY-
Computer: Dell XPS 8000

You have the same computer as me :o
I've changed mine a bit though

[Sebster 105]

I have 2 monitors but 1 cable.

[JD]

-snip-

wtf dude I had the exact same desk as in the last pic
my girlfriend also gave me her old desktop which came in the same case as the one you displayed in the last pic.

[JD]

Not necessarily.
Wave your hand infront of your face.
See that blur?
That's your eyes not capturing your hands fast enough.
Our eyes don't use frames, but if they did, it would be pretty high.

You are a stupid incorrect forget. The only reason there is a blur is because the lighting you are currently using is stuff and has a low refresh rate. If you had better lighting, there would be no blur. Human eyes capture the reflected light off surfaces, so therefore your lights are stuff, not your eyes. Your monitor is probably stuff too.
Shut up and leave.

[Tokerovin]

That is simply not true; our ability to perceive the changes in an image varies from person to person, just as our perceptions of taste, sound, and color can vary. Gender, ethnicity, age, and a variety of other factors can affect our ability to notice certain effects. An example of this is the "mosquito ringtone", a sound whose frequency simply can't be heard by most adults, but can easily annoy younger people whose ears are still sensitive enough to hear it.

Thus whilst 24 FPS may be sufficient for some people, others do notice the difference and find that a higher FPS is more desirable (or necessary) for enjoyment.

You are completely right about the variation from user to user, and how sensual perceptions can be altered etc.

The point is that I, as the user, can not detect any lag on either setting, therefore talking about this is useless.

[steve5451]

You are a stupid incorrect forget. The only reason there is a blur is because the lighting you are currently using is stuff and has a low refresh rate. If you had better lighting, there would be no blur. Human eyes capture the reflected light off surfaces, so therefore your lights are stuff, not your eyes. Your monitor is probably stuff too.
Shut up and leave.

No need to get mad, bro.
And there's plenty of light outside, yet when cars pass by fast, you get blur.

[Healbadbad]

We see at about 60fps.

[Mr.LoLHaX]

We see at about 60fps.

I see at 12.2 fps.

Oh god, I'm lagging again.

[steve5451]

You need a new graphics cell.