BC2 or MW2?

[RandomFlamer]

BC2 because it depends on teamwork and destructible buildings.

While MW2 just have pro jugger and pro commando newbs owning everyone.

[Ad Bot]

[blaman]

Bad Company 2.
Although I think he's already decided?

[Agent Awsome]

Bad Company 2 too. It's EPIC!

[Marcem]

MW2 has a nice story

What.

[Dippindots]

MW2.

[skill4life]

Bad Company 2 is so epic.

EDIT: And the multiplayer on Bad Company 2 is way better. And before you fanboys say "OMGADXZ NOOOO", Listen up to my reasoning. Basically, every game of MW2, There's usually some guy who beats everyone else, and that team usually wins because of that one person racking up a 25 kill streak or just overall defeating the teams. In BC2, Kills level you up, But overall do not help your team win if you're just killing everyone. Your main goal in most of the games is to do objectives. You don't run around knifing every person you see, standing in open and. BC2 is more strategic in multiplayer, and more overall fun.

[Splatter U]

Sure get bc2 if you like a campaign that gets boring fast, and online where you get killed lightning fast, and have giant respawn times... Enjoy.

[SkullCandy]

LOOK! I think people go to Bad Company because it's a NEW GAME. THERE'S NO POINT IN TRYING TO COMPARE THE TWO GAMES! Now stop this silly little war already! I say both are good. MW2 was good when it came out, and so was BFBC: 2.

[Fizzles]

They're about a month apart dumbass.
There were no technological advancements from MW2 to BC2

[SkullCandy]

They're about a month apart dumbass.
There were no technological advancements from MW2 to BC2

I thought so, because MW2 came out in November - December(I forgot) 2009 something and BC2 came out in March 2010. But still, there was no point in this war.