And...So yeah, I don't really find 9/11 all that important of an event.Sure people died, and I feel sorry for them, but they aren't hero's, because they didn't actually do anything heroic.
Yes. They (well, technically the north tower, which was six feet taller) were the tallest buildings in the world from their completion to the completion of the Sears (now Willis) tower.
The monetary losses of the structural damage wasn't enough to cause any harm to the economy. And...So yeah, I don't really find 9/11 all that important of an event.Sure people died, and I feel sorry for them, but they aren't hero's, because they didn't actually do anything heroic.
Oh you know, besides the fact that most obviously it launched us into a war that we've been fighting for nine years and can probably be blamed for our economic downturn over the last few years, 9/11 was small potatoes.Fool.
Bush launched us into that war.And it's not the cause of your economic downturn, that may very well be the war.Foeul.
the entire world is suffering economic downfall. all considering, the US isnt doing to bad actually.wars actually have a proven history of helping the economy. if anything, being at war kept us from really going under.
What.Bush launched us into the war in DIRECT RETALIATION to the attacks on 9/11. And, if you attribute economic downturn to the war and the war to bush's tirade and bush's tirade to 9/11, then it's logically sound to attribute all of that to 9/11.
Did you just justify war with economics?
Also, the "effect" doesn't wear off after time. The catalyst of something ALWAYS remains the same- i.e. we will ALWAYS have been in this war because of 9/11- it's the direct catalyst.
Wait, they made another one? /facepalm, theres gonna be another arab flyin a plane at it next sept. 11th. On a side note...
Yep, bush is the only reason we're at war. Because NO competent president would ever send us into war because they attacked us!
Yeah except we have better airport security nowhijacks = totally unlikely
