You're over thinking this.
It's not like I was saying this is absolute fact.
Rather, they're more like guidelines.
That's fine but you can't make a huge logical argument and argue that it was just food for thought when someone shows that it's based on an argument that you can't substantiate.
further foods: it is impossible to be one or two dimensional.
if one's goal is completion and it isn't reached, the goal hasn't been achieved.
I'm trying to say that he can't demonstrate either of those two things so his argument cannot be considered to be correct.