Author Topic: Syerjchep --- img2brick soon --- quick rate --- tracking --- more stuff!  (Read 21321 times)

I think you only went to the trouble of writing a "webserver" so you could put "This website is hosted on a webserver I made myself in c++." at the top.

  • 1. A brick add-on maker, which can make bricks, even print bricks or bricks that are water. You just go to the website, choose the settings of the brick you want, and submit, and the server generates the download for you right there.

  • 2. Cross server chat, though a secondary server I will host, that allows cross server chat, though an add-on, without port forwarding.


1. already made, and several times at that, and like others, only allows you to make one brick at a time.

2. unless your a programming god like Ephi, not possible. plus, xserver is nearly the exact same thing, and its more convinent.

not all that impressed.

I think you only went to the trouble of writing a "webserver" so you could put "This website is hosted on a webserver I made myself in c++." at the top.
Actually I was thinking of removing that message.
You see, I'm actually in the process of redesigning the website with CSS as I type this.
1. already made, and several times at that, and like others, only allows you to make one brick at a time.

2. unless your a programming god like Ephi, not possible. plus, xserver is nearly the exact same thing, and its more convinent.

not all that impressed.
1. All the implications have been made as .exe files, which are not allowed to be posted here.
2. I've made things like it before, it would be easy, and as convient as the other add-on, except port forwarding is not required.

Well hurr. But tons of people download firebug. Anyways, if someone is tech savvy enough to write CSS code, I'm sure downloading firebug wouldn't be all that difficult...
That wasn't related. You claimed that many modern browsers has this feature built-in. Also, firebug is only available in the full version for Firefox. And it would be reset upon page reload. A greasemonkey userscript would be needed for this.
Allowing other people to see user-defined customization would be idiotic. For example, I could set my some element of my profile to display the lemonparty picture.
Idiotic? The CSS code can only decide how a page looks, not how it works. Allowing this form of customization would be an easy way to give people the ability to give their profile a personal touch without any real security issues. And for the image, so what? But if you really want strict moderation you two could come up with some moderation system. Or an option to disable other people's page's custom themes (completely or just that person).
I think you only went to the trouble of writing a "webserver" so you could put "This website is hosted on a webserver I made myself in c++." at the top.
I have to agree about this.

I think you only went to the trouble of writing a "webserver" so you could put "This website is hosted on a webserver I made myself in c++." at the top.
Or perhaps he just wanted to do it for the fun of it?

It wouldn't be the first time someone has made something 'for the hell of it'.

Idiotic? The CSS code can only decide how a page looks, not how it works. Allowing this form of customization would be an easy way to give people the ability to give their profile a personal touch without any real security issues. And for the image, so what? But if you really want strict moderation you two could come up with some moderation system. Or an option to disable other people's page's custom themes (completely or just that person).
Or eliminate the problem all together and offer certain pre-made themes/color schemes for profiles.

I suppose once again it's a matter of judgment. Is it worth sacrificing some freedom to gain some safety, content-wise? I don't want to see gay research when I click on some dude's profile, but I also don't want to be completely unable to customize my own.

Ah well. I guess I dunno where I stand on this.

Also, it's worth noting that CSS can really forget with sites - for example, you can edit height and width attributes on images for example which would rape the layout.

EDIT: Another thing. Chat should go from oldest to newest. That's just customary. If you want, create an anchor at the bottom and link the user there when he opens the comments section, but don't have it go in reverse chronological order, that's insane.
« Last Edit: April 29, 2011, 08:36:40 PM by cucumberdude »

I have to agree about this.
Hi, I totally didn't just say that the homepage is gonna be redone soon and the text will be removed.

Or eliminate the problem all together and offer certain pre-made themes/color schemes for profiles.

I suppose once again it's a matter of judgment. Is it worth sacrificing some freedom to gain some safety, content-wise? I don't want to see gay research when I click on some dude's profile, but I also don't want to be completely unable to customize my own.

Ah well. I guess I dunno where I stand on this.

Also, it's worth noting that CSS can really forget with sites - for example, you can edit height and width attributes on images for example which would rape the layout.
You can just parse it out.

EDIT: And you might want to note that Truce's web server that is run in TorqueScript is faster then this. That's when you know you've done something wrong.

You are sandboxing each page right?
« Last Edit: April 29, 2011, 08:46:52 PM by Destiny/Zack0Wack0 »

You are sandboxing each page right?
Sandboxing?

But I hope you did see my posts where I said I'd be concentrating on improving the server itself a lot this weekend?

Yes, I did. I was just telling you to encourage you to improve it more.

And by sandboxing I meant you have each page have it's own thread that can do absolutely nothing to the main thread/server.
EDIT: Or any other pages.

Yes, I did. I was just telling you to encourage you to improve it more.

And by sandboxing I meant you have each page have it's own thread that can do absolutely nothing to the main thread/server.
EDIT: Or any other pages.
Each page?
No, no, no, this server takes each connection into it's own thread, regardless of page, which has nothing to do with the main thread/server.

OK that's what I meant, good.

OK that's what I meant, good.
Yeah.
Right now all I know about the crashes is that they usually happen after a socket is said to have been closed for inactivity.

Anyway, I redid the comment board, anyone have any opinions on it?
BTW, next for reformatting is the homepage.

I can try and make a design for you if you want. I am not the best, but I can do simple. Which looks like what you need.

I can try and make a design for you if you want. I am not the best, but I can do simple. Which looks like what you need.
Sure, I'll take you up on your offer.
But first, what do you think of the current homepage and comments board. (comments board was updated within the last few minutes)

Sure, I'll take you up on your offer.
But first, what do you think of the current homepage and comments board. (comments board was updated within the last few minutes)
What sort of colour scheme do you want?

Um, it's OK. But it needs some work.