Poll

Atheism, Deism, or Other

Atheism
64 (58.2%)
Deism
12 (10.9%)
Other
28 (25.5%)
Theism
3 (2.7%)
Agnosticism
3 (2.7%)

Total Members Voted: 110

Author Topic: All Powerful Monotheistic God vs Atheism  (Read 16795 times)

"Oh ok I'll leave the thread because you don't agree with my OPINION."

I like how you subtly try to force your religion upon people. You might as well be saying go to hell because I don't want to believe in a god.

You want to know my opinion? Is there a god? Could be there but I have no loving idea as to how he's like since of the vast sea of religions out there. What if a religion is correct? Well then send me to hell because apparently based off what people say I don't agree with god. I don't see what's wrong with gay people. If I fight for that single right then send me to hell. If there's a religion out there that says Blonde people don't get to go to heaven then I'm going to fight for that right. Whoever god is I know that I'm going to disagree with something he thinks should go. I'm not perfect but I'm not a mindless robot who dedicates his life to a man who supposedly gave him the right to be FREE.

Also don't get the wrong idea, I'm not Blonde nor gay but it's rights that I believe shouldn't be legible as to whether a person is given eternal happiness.


Thank you for your display of teenage angst.

Can you debunk every single proof on every side? Because one side is claiming they have proof, so in order to make the proof null you gotta  debunk them.
I don't need to. They debunk themselves on the base of not being actual proof.


Thank you for your display of teenage angst.

Oh I'm a teenager so I'm obviously immature and don't know how to think for myself.

You sure act mature for your age as well. Probably someone without a job going around to hopefully convert a few unknowing kids to get a free ticket to heaven.

The point of being agnostic is to keep an open mind. I'm not trying to be rebellious or different. I'm just trying to figure out what to find logical.

Your argument is just simply an insult while avoiding my opinion. Nice job.

I don't need to. They debunk themselves on the base of not being actual proof.

The Theory of relativity has no proof because it debunks it self.


If you believe in god, you can either fall into one of two categories.

You are an innocent person who merely needs someone or something to make you feel safe and happy. I have no problem with these people.

The other category crosses the line, and is using imaginary friends to justify killing people in other countries, or denying medical care to your innocent children because you think god will cure them. These people cross the line, and their beliefs are no longer innocent. I hate these people, they are scrubs and are the very scum of the earth.

If you believe in god, you can either fall into one of two categories.

You are an innocent person who merely needs someone or something to make you feel safe and happy. I have no problem with these people.

The other category crosses the line, and is using imaginary friends to justify killing people in other countries, or denying medical care to your innocent children because you think god will cure them. These people cross the line, and their beliefs are no longer innocent. I hate these people, they are scrubs and are the very scum of the earth.

I'm pretty sure it's illogical to split a huge population size into 2 categories.

I'm pretty sure it's illogical to split a huge population size into 2 categories.

Even if he's right.

The Theory of relativity has no proof because it debunks it self.
I wasn't talking about a side by itself. I was talking about all sides.


ALSO

The Theory of relativity has no proof because it debunks it self.
the·o·ry
   [thee-uh-ree, theer-ee]
–noun, plural -ries.
1.
a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.
2.
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.

I wasn't talking about a side by itself. I was talking about all sides.


ALSO
the·o·ry
   [thee-uh-ree, theer-ee]
–noun, plural -ries.
1.
a coherent group of general propositions used as principles of explanation for a class of phenomena: Einstein's theory of relativity.
2.
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.


A Scientific theory does go through many trials, but in a way I guess you are right. That still does not change the fact you have to debunk every single proof made by atheists and deists.


A Scientific theory does go through many trials, but in a way I guess you are right.

Yes he is. Religion is basically a theory. You don't have proof either. That's what he's been saying.

That still does not change the fact you have to debunk every single proof made by atheists and deists.
I don't need to. They debunk themselves on the base of not being actual proof.

Then blam. Thread over.

Then blam. Thread over.

Can you prove it to me they are not proof? I want you to give each and single proof a chance and prove it to me they are not legit proofs.

Start handing over "proofs."

Can you prove it to me they are not proof? I want you to give each and single proof a chance and prove it to me they are not legit proofs.

Exactly. Neither side can be proved. So what's the point of discussing this rather than unneeded rage? Since that's what this thread is basically about let's throw random insults at each other!

ArchAngel, you are a loving ignorant piece of stuff who is oblivious to everyone's opinion in which you can only take something  irrelevant out of someone's post.