Author Topic: Kerbal Space Program, Or: How I learned to stop worrying and love THRUSTERRRSSSS  (Read 347133 times)

but that's why you keep loving trying and testing to make it work
And that's why I love this game.

And that's why I love this game.
exactly
if it doesn't work, watch it explode and then try again
that's how actual rocket scientists did it

exactly
if it doesn't work, watch it explode and then try again
that's how actual rocket scientists did it
Yep, still how they're doing it. SpaceX is doing a pad abort test soon, testing is crucial in engineering.

Also, I'm trying out the RemoteTech mod, trying to set up a network of satellites to keep communication with Mission Control, jesus it's difficult to time launches for this.

actually, shuttles don't work in vanilla ksp due to a lack of automatic gimbaling adjustment as fuel burns as well as lazy aerodynamic models that makes shuttles impractical on the scale we know them :\

actually, shuttles don't work in vanilla ksp due to a lack of automatic gimbaling adjustment as fuel burns as well as lazy aerodynamic models that makes shuttles impractical on the scale we know them :\

also mass based drag

actually, shuttles don't work in vanilla ksp due to a lack of automatic gimbaling adjustment as fuel burns as well as lazy aerodynamic models that makes shuttles impractical on the scale we know them :\
Shuttles work. You just can't build an exact replica of the American space shuttle.

Successfully set up my kerbostationary orbit system:



Replaces my stuff low-altitude IKC system. Bring on the Mun probes.

Triple toast. Turns out geostationary orbits don't cover communications at the poles very well.

Triple toast. Turns out geostationary orbits don't cover communications at the poles very well.
haha amateur
i attempted this without the mod and managed to get like 8 in geostationary orbit. 4 going on the equator and 4 on the polar. it was magnificent, then i cried because it was absolutely useless

haha amateur
i attempted this without the mod and managed to get like 8 in geostationary orbit. 4 going on the equator and 4 on the polar. it was magnificent, then i cried because it was absolutely useless
Why would you need more than three in geostationary?

I'll probably put two at near opposite ends in a vertical orbit, just for the sweet science at the poles.

its weird but instead of a triangle i tried to make a square... dont judge

Why would you need more than three in geostationary?

I'll probably put two at near opposite ends in a vertical orbit, just for the sweet science at the poles.
honestly, just because of the imprecision in KSP, since you can't make perfect orbits, you need at least six in a spherical shape to ensure coverage.

honestly, just because of the imprecision in KSP, since you can't make perfect orbits, you need at least six in a spherical shape to ensure coverage.
Coverage of what?

Coverage of what?
.....the planet and surrounding area with signals?

.....the planet and surrounding area with signals?
I've covered pretty much all that matters with those 3. Except for the surface of Kerbin around the poles...