Total Members Voted: 29
Eliminate the impure for a better future? That seems a bit national socialist to me.
But think about it like this:If we go all "natural selection" and don't make people wear their seatbelts and someone runs a red light in front of you and you hit them and kill them due to their lack of a seatbelt, would you want to carry that guilt?
Natural selection is as it says, natural. How can it be deemed in any way, national socialist-ish?
You're eliminating who you think is impure, like how Riddler viewed Jew's to be impure.
Except that isn't entirely the case. People do not wear seat belts because they aren't properly educated, so instead of eliminating them, why not teach them.
http://ehs.okstate.edu/kopykit/seatbelt.htmhttp://www.car-accidents.com/pages/seat_belts.htmlhttp://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/seatb.htmlFrom one of the pages it says, "63% of all people killed in an accident were not wearing a seatbelt."This is more than enough for me to wear my seatbelt. The government is protecting from human stupidity and gain money as well. Win, win law for them.
Do I win? =D