What's the difference between AMD and Intel? Is AMD magically far superior or am I just experiencing insulted fanboy attacks?
Different brands. Different technologies to solve the same problems.
AMD used to dominate the CPU market in the days of the Athlon 64. Then in the Core 2 Duo days, Intel really won performance, and AMD hasn't had any big architecture changes to combat that, even right through Intel's changing from Pentium, to C2D, to C2E, to i3, i5 and i7, and even Sandy Bridge.
Until AMD Bulldozer, released a month or so ago. These are the 8 core Zambezi's that you see. This is the first major architecture change on AMD's side for about 8 or so years. However this is the first stage of this architecture so it's not beating Intel's Sandy Bridge in gaming, but it is beating them in multitasking and stuff like encoding due to its number of cores. Apparently the next refinement of this architecture will be next year, and will really blow away Intel. We can only wait and hope.
Intel is coming out with another refinement soon as well, called Ivy Bridge. Should be interesting.