Author Topic: Hawf draws stuff  (Read 135665 times)

words don't have a specific meaning. They can mean anything.
then all your words mean stuff  :cookieMonster:

then all your words mean stuff  :cookieMonster:
I love you, you're so beautiful

Been told by who, I'm only an ass to you because you deserve it. Too bad you all think I'm flaming his art, which is not what my posts are aimed at. But okay, ignore my posts and interpret them how ever you feel. Even though I said several times his art is good you still think that I think it's horrible. But you know, words don't have a specific meaning. They can mean anything.
I never said I thought YOU thought my art was horrible
the thing is Barely anyone gives me crits on the things I post
you've only told me to step up on quality but that's only as specific as you got.

Tommy had admitted to being a pompous prick.  He doesn't take all criticism as "flaming," I think I've offered the most negative feedback in the topic, and he responded to it VERY well.

His style isn't perfect, and he's admitted that he should drop it soon.  Either way, this doesn't imply that your perception of what's professonial caliber should interfere with his artwork.

I also find it funny that you, coincidentally, offerred an example for "good art" that replicates your style EXACTLY.
http://khronon.deviantart.com/
I, personally, believe this style shows how one who has such a poor sense of proportioning and lighting can make their art look fancy through the use of digital highlight-based tools.

Even more so, the style you posted actually takes less work/time than the one Tommy is promoting.  Your vision of "quality" is blinded by your own insecurity towards what you have the ability to do.

Tommy's a stuff, yes.  He's incredibly arrogant and has a very low tolerance level.  However, I don't see the reason behind constantly badgering him about it.  He's admitted to some of these faults, and he's actually taking advice given from some of the people posting in this topic.  The fact that you posted examples of artwork, to embrace on an opinion of one's attitude, is loving absurd.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2011, 09:09:02 PM by Lalam24 »

Tommy had admitted to being a pompous prick.  He doesn't take all criticism as "flaming," I think I've offered the most negative feedback in the topic, and he responded to it VERY well.

His style isn't perfect, and he's admitted that he should drop it soon.  Either way, this doesn't imply that your perception of what's professonial caliber should interfere with his artwork.

I also find it funny that you, coincidentally, offerred an example for "good art" that replicates your style EXACTLY.
http://khronon.deviantart.com/
I, personally, believe this style shows how one who has such a poor sense of proportioning and lighting can make their art look fancy through the use of digital highlight-based tools.

Even more so, the style you posted actually takes less work/time than the one Tommy is promoting.  Your vision of "quality" is blinded by your own insecurity towards what you have the ability to do.

Tommy's a stuff, yes.  He's incredibly arrogant and has a very low tolerance level.  However, I don't see the reason behind constantly badgering him about it.  But he's admitted to some of these faults, and he's actually taking advice given from some of the people posting in this topic.  The fact that you posted examples or artwork, to embrace on an opinion of one's attitude, is loving absurd.

I agree with every last thing in this post

well can you get back to me ASAP about the capri sun pic

i need this

well can you get back to me ASAP about the capri sun pic

i need this
why?


bloop

Nico bellic with an INTENSE widow's peak

Nico bellic with an INTENSE widow's peak

exact reference image used

Tommy had admitted to being a pompous prick.  He doesn't take all criticism as "flaming," I think I've offered the most negative feedback in the topic, and he responded to it VERY well.

His style isn't perfect, and he's admitted that he should drop it soon.  Either way, this doesn't imply that your perception of what's professonial caliber should interfere with his artwork.

I also find it funny that you, coincidentally, offerred an example for "good art" that replicates your style EXACTLY.
http://khronon.deviantart.com/
I, personally, believe this style shows how one who has such a poor sense of proportioning and lighting can make their art look fancy through the use of digital highlight-based tools.

Even more so, the style you posted actually takes less work/time than the one Tommy is promoting.  Your vision of "quality" is blinded by your own insecurity towards what you have the ability to do.

Tommy's a stuff, yes.  He's incredibly arrogant and has a very low tolerance level.  However, I don't see the reason behind constantly badgering him about it.  He's admitted to some of these faults, and he's actually taking advice given from some of the people posting in this topic.  The fact that you posted examples of artwork, to embrace on an opinion of one's attitude, is loving absurd.

I'm going to verify all your arguments

"I, personally, believe this style shows how one who has such a poor sense of proportioning and lighting can make their art look fancy through the use of digital highlight-based tools."

Correct, that is the whole concept of this style is based around.

"I also find it funny that you, coincidentally, offerred an example for "good art" that replicates your style EXACTLY.
http://khronon.deviantart.com/
I, personally, believe this style shows how one who has such a poor sense of proportioning and lighting can make their art look fancy through the use of digital highlight-based tools."

Wrong, I no longer use this style. It was for study purposes. Something easy that doesn't require knowledge of anatonomy or proportions. But tommy's style also lacks proportion. My current style is what I have developed myself after looking at concept art for games like AC2 and GW2.
Here is a quick 20-25 minute sketch to give you an idea; as much as I hate this it's the only thing I could do because I have an essay to do after this.


"Even more so, the style you posted actually takes less work/time than the one Tommy is promoting.  Your vision of "quality" is blinded by your own insecurity towards what you have the ability to do."

Wrong, you do not know the amount of time it takes to create a piece of this style. I would respect you more if you did not claim your biased opinions as facts.

But since you told me that tommy already admitted he can be an ass I think I can deal with him now.

« Last Edit: December 04, 2011, 11:11:56 PM by Woolys »



But since you told me that tommy already admitted he can be an ass I think I can deal with him now.


you didn't read it several pages ago?

also please don't compare my art style to another style that's incomparable

you didn't read it several pages ago?

also please don't compare my art style to another style that's incomparable

Well I was focusing on the quality. You can look back I think a page or 2, I posted a more reasonable example which is closer your art style. Wait nvm, I'll just copy and paste it so you know exactly what I mean.


Would you mind posting the artist of that picture?

Wooly, what in gods name are you trying to accomplish here?

Jesus, talk about a johnny one-note.

that net nanny still makes me laugh on occasion