Author Topic: Stocking - No explanation needed.  (Read 51602 times)

personally i think its right to be mad if you can get arrested because someone posted something on a internet legos forum

itt: brutally buttmad brit tries to push his imperialist agenda
All i was talking about how Stocking could get actual people in legal trouble, not the country itself.
They aren't nude though.

And what kind of sick, twisted country would outlaw lolicon?

The UKraine
It's far too obvious that you're trolling here.
I remember someone called Vertzer on the forum sometime in late 2007, he was openly discussing child research and got banned in a huge drama.
And you? you actually posted the sick material, which is even worse,  i don't know why moderation here has degraded so loving much.

I remember someone called Vertzer on the forum sometime in late 2007, he was openly discussing child research and got banned in a huge drama.
And you? you actually posted the sick material, which is even worse,  i don't know why moderation here has degraded so loving much.

The reason child research is illegal is because it's evidence of child abuse, and anyone owning material like that should be rightly prosecuted.

Loli/Shota are just illustrated works of art, nobody's hurt by it. The only reason it's illegal in your country is because your queen is too inbred to know the difference.

There wasn't any nudity in them.
If those were bannable, Hot Girls wouldn't even be here.

loli and molesting children is encouraged in america anyway. one word - christianity. priests are homoloveual recruitment tools. if you go to church you will be loveually assaulted. it's in the bible. jesus loves you.

loli and molesting children is encouraged in america anyway. one word - christianity. priests are homoloveual recruitment tools. if you go to church you will be loveually assaulted. it's in the bible. jesus loves you.
Man you really are an idiot.

All i was talking about how Stocking could get actual people in legal trouble, not the country itself.
Ok, and...

Ok, and...
That should be bannable in itself, it's a step further from her usual trolling.

They weren't completely nude, but they still count as adult content, they were suggestive, they had cameltoes visible in them, hell, they also derive from hentai/research websites (Reverse google image search), but you reuploaded them to imgr to be on the safe side.

Not to mention it was MADE as fap material for sick forgets.

Man you really are an idiot.

what do you think child tax is for? it's money that goes to the church so they can recruit more homoloveual priests to molest the children. this is all clear as day. why do you think churches have colored windows? kids loving love colors, that's why. don't go to church unless you want to get raped.

That should be bannable in itself, it's a step further from her usual trolling.

They weren't completely nude, but they still count as adult content, they were suggestive, they had cameltoes visible in them, hell, they also derive from hentai/research websites (Reverse google image search), but you reuploaded them to imgr to be on the safe side.

Not to mention it was MADE as fap material for sick forgets.

You won't get arrested for almost-naked cartoon girls in any first-world-country, no matter how inbred their queen is.

That should be bannable in itself, it's a step further from her usual trolling.

They weren't completely nude, but they still count as adult content, they were suggestive, they had cameltoes visible in them, hell, they also derive from hentai/research websites (Reverse google image search), but you reuploaded them to imgr to be on the safe side.

Not to mention it was MADE as fap material for sick forgets.


wow you sure know your kiddy research. you should be a priest.

You won't get arrested for almost-naked cartoon girls in any first-world-country, no matter how inbred their queen is.
I don't see what is it with you and a monarch who rarely does anything anymore.
And it can be research even when it's not naked, as long as it's made as fap material and is really, really suggestive.

I don't see what is it with you and a monarch who rarely does anything anymore.
And it can be research even when it's not naked, as long as it's made as fap material and is really, really suggestive.

I don't think your constables will look the other way as long as you like, burn some loli on a disk for them to show at the police department.

Your trolling is so painfully obvious, it's a saddening miracle it hasn't gotten you banned.

Ya rlly sopt beeing a trole it hurts afptonites feelings :((