Author Topic: ■ The Photography Megathread ■  (Read 277945 times)

sah vintage~*~*~*~**~**

It's tilted horribly to one side. And a picture of a cloud.

it looked good to me since i had to take it at that angle because of objects in front of me at the time

This is a photography thread, not a "random snapshots" thread.

at least i was trying. forget i get it

at least i was trying. forget i get it

Try not to pay too close of attention to those people.
They're the kind of photographers who consider themselves utmost artists, who don't dare experiment with the bulb or break the rule of thirds.

I thought they were nice, especially the one with the sun behind the clouds.

Try not to pay too close of attention to those people.
They're the kind of photographers who consider themselves utmost artists, who don't dare experiment with the bulb or break the rule of thirds.

I thought they were nice, especially the one with the sun behind the clouds.

The rule he's breaking is "don't take a boring photo". He's not experimenting, he's taking the most bbrown town shots of cities from afar with no interesting take on anything. The sun behind the clouds looks like he was trying to take a picture of the clouds and couldn't hold the camera straight. If he posted a thread whose title was "I went on a trip to New York (pictures inside)" I wouldn't go in that thread and say "these pictures are not good", but he's posting in a thread specifically for interesting photography, not vacation snapshots.

I think if he's trying to take good pictures, it's not a good idea to be encouraging and give praise by default.  I'll encourage him to take more pictures, I'll tell him why the pictures he posted aren't good, but I'm not going to try and construe a way to say that those pictures were interesting or demonstrated anything higher than the ability to point a camera vaguely at something he found interesting and open the shutter on full auto.

So right now I'm stuck in postproduction hell, where I have a seriously lag between having the photos edited on my computer, and having them organized. Today I just finished a photo from June 27th. Anyways, HDD crash, lost 10 photos which I'm hoping to find lower resolution versions of, and 41 RAWs.

So here are some photos:















The rule he's breaking is "don't take a boring photo". He's not experimenting, he's taking the most bbrown town shots of cities from afar with no interesting take on anything. The sun behind the clouds looks like he was trying to take a picture of the clouds and couldn't hold the camera straight. If he posted a thread whose title was "I went on a trip to New York (pictures inside)" I wouldn't go in that thread and say "these pictures are not good", but he's posting in a thread specifically for interesting photography, not vacation snapshots.

I think if he's trying to take good pictures, it's not a good idea to be encouraging and give praise by default.  I'll encourage him to take more pictures, I'll tell him why the pictures he posted aren't good, but I'm not going to try and construe a way to say that those pictures were interesting or demonstrated anything higher than the ability to point a camera vaguely at something he found interesting and open the shutter on full auto.

I'm sorry for what I said. I suppose you're right. I just don't live in the most scenic place so at least give me some slack when I see something I think would look good as a photo.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2012, 02:09:46 AM by Sami2ss »

I'm sorry for what I said. I suppose you're right. I just don't live in the most scenic place.
>new york city
>not scenic
New York is a very scenic and lively city. There's a lot of potential for photography. You have it easy.

The reason we can't give you any legitimate critique is because you need to make a better attempt of being creative. Think outside the box, try to photograph buildings for more interesting perspectives. Posting snapshots is like making us breakfast cereal and asking if you're a good cook. We need to see your vision before we can comment on your photos.

I think someone should start a topic in Off-Topic where people can post snapshots of their last vacation, their cat, what they did last night, etc. That way we don't have people getting their feelings hurt when the post that stuff here and we tell them it sucks.

>new york city
>not scenic
New York is a very scenic and lively city. There's a lot of potential for photography. You have it easy.

The reason we can't give you any legitimate critique is because you need to make a better attempt of being creative. Think outside the box, try to photograph buildings for more interesting perspectives. Posting snapshots is like making us breakfast cereal and asking if you're a good cook. We need to see your vision before we can comment on your photos.

I think someone should start a topic in Off-Topic where people can post snapshots of their last vacation, their cat, what they did last night, etc. That way we don't have people getting their feelings hurt when the post that stuff here and we tell them it sucks.

I mean the area where I live. I don't know, I feel it's weird for people to be watching me walking outside and just taking pictures.

I'm sorry for what I said. I suppose you're right. I just don't live in the most scenic place so at least give me some slack when I see something I think would look good as a photo.

I mean, you don't have to be sorry, I'm just glad you're listening to what I'm saying, because I am trying to help. I would give my left nut (the left one. I care about it a little bit less) to live in NYC as a photographer. The potential for street photography is awesome. Just run up to someone and take a picture of them. Someone interesting looking, of course, but most people don't mind if you're brief, and if you're discreet most people won't even notice enough to care. This guy's work is pretty good. Not the best street photography I've seen, but if you type "NYC street photography" or just "street photography" into google, you'll get plenty of things to look through.

In general, anywhere you live there are interesting things to take pictures of, you just need to be willing to look, and work. If you're walking around with your camera and you see something that looks cool, ask yourself "what's the best way to take a picture of this such that people will know I thought it was interesting?" Refer back to this post for a little thing I wrote and good example of how to find something you think is interesting and really "take a picture of it".

I mean the area where I live. I don't know, I feel it's weird for people to be watching me walking outside and just taking pictures.




You need to (and will, if you're out enough) get over this feeling if you want to take decent pictures in populated places. One thing I find helps is completely engrossing yourself in taking the picture. When I said that you need to fill the frame with whatever you find interesting, that's not just something you practice enough and then it's something you instantly do whenever you want to take a picture. It becomes a subconscious process, but it's definitely still a process you have to go through every time you take a picture. I can look through albums of mine and see 30 pictures in a row of roughly the same thing where I can actually see my thought process of composition evolving as I take the picture. Take a picture. Look at it. Move in a few steps. Take another picture. Look at that. Move to the right a few steps to line something up. Etc.

This is to say, if you're focusing enough on composition and the picture you're trying to take, and if you really care about nailing it, the way people might be looking at you kind of fade away. You get sort of "tunnel visioned" on the scene, and unless you're doing some really ridiculous thing, people probably aren't going to care.

For a decent illustration of this, look at this photo.



I took this photo when I was about your age (between 7th and 8th grade, so maybe actually younger) on a family trip to LA. I was walking around downtown in shorts, an undershirt and flip-flops, with my little Sony Cybershot. And, this was actually before I really called myself a photographer and learned all these rules and methods of taking interesting photos, which amazes me because I still like this photo even now. Anyway, I really, really liked the reflectiveness of this weird sculpture thing on the sidewalk (which is that thing you see on the left that's reflecting the buildings) I actually found them in street view, look.



Anyway, I was enamored with how reflective these guys were and how cool it look reflecting the texture of the nearby building, so I spent like five minutes awkwardly crouched under the thing trying to take that photo, and I think it paid off. People were probably looking at me like "lolwut is this kid doing" but I got the shot, and that's all that I care about now.

What I mean is that the actual area where I live. There really isn't anything special any tourists would really take a picture of, you never see anyone around here taking picture, while in a different spot in NY, there are pretty much photographers anywhere, though I guess there is still some beauty. I think it's pretty much the fact the only professional camera I have at home has no strap so I have to take it out every time I want to take a picture, lol.

What I mean is that the actual area where I live. There really isn't anything special any tourists would really take a picture of, you never see anyone around here taking picture, while in a different spot in NY, there are pretty much photographers anywhere, though I guess there is still some beauty. I think it's pretty much the fact the only professional camera I have at home has no strap so I have to take it out every time I want to take a picture, lol.
It doesn't matter that there aren't places that 'people normally stop to take pictures of.' that's fine. I was in DC and took this picture in the National Building Museum. Touristy spot, well known building, whatever. I love the building.



Then I had to go to the bathroom, and I took this picture after turning around from using the urinal.



Not the best picture I've taken, but it's a good illustration of the fact that you can take a picture of just about anything, anywhere. That doesn't mean that any picture can be justified as interesting or good, but if you're willing to look, there's things to take pictures of.

I wish I had a real camera. I was in my school's photography club, and I plan on rejoining when the school year starts again.










Some photos from around Adelaide. Click for full size!

These are all pictures I took with my old Canon EOS 10D. I use an EOS 60D now, and have gotten much better; I'm simply going through all of my old photos and uploading them to my blog. I've only got a few left so once I get those uploaded, expect a few from my 60D
« Last Edit: July 08, 2012, 12:57:25 AM by Kniaz »

Those are alright. Last one would be really good if you'd taken the picture in line with the top of those things on the bottom, put it on the third, and straightened out the line it formed.

Those are alright. Last one would be really good if you'd taken the picture in line with the top of those things on the bottom, put it on the third, and straightened out the line it formed.

Yeah, those are some of the first photos I ever took with my 10D haha

I've finished going through those photos and they're all on my blog, so I'll be showing off some 60D stuff later.