I object to this photographic evidence on the grounds that NOWHERE has the prosecution shown WHO was in control of the vehicle at the time of the incident. There is no evidence demonstrating that it was truly the driver of the jeep who was steering, rather than being a mere passenger, OR the reverse. Which of these was the defendant? This alleged photographic evidence is so unclear that you can't tell who the defendant is, no matter what the prosecution would have you believe.
The prosecution has made an attempt to shock the jury with gory pictures of the event as a substitute for proving who was actually culpable. It is mere smoke and mirrors designed to publicly deface the defendant and attempt to ensure a false guilty verdict.
The defense rests.
