It's funny how tomtom accuses glass of changing the subject to tomtom's backdoors....... but tomtom is changing the subject
away from them back to how there is no proof.
in fact, he's completely missing obvious defenses in order to do so:
Tomtom could use ally's account to backdoor glasses server.
To me, thats a VERY good reason.
If TomTom actually would do this, he's a friend and I've lost all respect for him.
this is
not possible unless ally's bl_id had eval. tomtom undoubtedly knows this and will agree profusely with me. however, this is not the point that tomtom points out. what does he point out?
Oh look, this random garbage again. I've already explained how glass has no proof at all of a backdoor.
Basilcy what your saying, "oh no somebody can connect to a public server. MUST BE BACKDOORING!!"
disregarding the fact that the statement is simply impossible, he argues more generically.
i'm seeing right through this tomtom. I too wish for glass to provide evidence, but you are really doing a poor job defending yourself.