Author Topic: Athiesm  (Read 12669 times)

I believe there is some evidence he existed (as a man)

He existed, but he had no unearthly power.

He was a guy. He was a Jew, too.

what am i doing here


ahhhh


ontopic:

i belive in god but i dont go to church i think im a jew
Same, but I am not a handicapped 11-year-old

also, I hate it when athiests push their stuff into my face, and I have a very thin line with that.
It's the same for even radical christians, or any other person with a radically religious view that pushes stuff in my face.

what do you even talk about here. srsly.
how 2 shot bible?

I believe there is some evidence he existed (as a man)
Let me get this straight: did the bible say he existed as a woman, or a raptor?

Religion is delusional.

yes

i wanted to test their hypothesis

seems fine so far
There have been hundreds of religion topics, they all turn out the same.

Trust me

Oh wait, I am a subtle Catholic


how 2 shot bible?
Let me get this straight: did the bible say he existed as a woman, or a raptor?
totally irrelevant

I am a very what you could call  "easy going" Christian.
I am more disappointed in other Christians sometimes than I am in Athiests
Some people are just really stupid and make all Christians look bad
I also don't go to church, preach to every person I see, or always carry a bible ready to beat someone with it


Some people are just really stupid and make all Christians look bad
It isn't so much that they're bad, but they're following a system which primarily causes evil.  I see many religious individuals referencing atheism as some sort of disease.  I also see many people considering it to be a religion.  To begin with, if you're monotheistic or polytheistic, you're not religious.  It's a single belief, not an entire set of guidelines.  Now, while I cannot consider myself to be atheist because I believe in the lack thereof what isn't absolute fact (though the Christian god, according to the bible's own inproper statements is, in fact, just as "real" as my imaginary friend bill), I still condone entirely a single belief.  However, if you base this belief around a religion/etc, and you do not follow the rest of said system, you do not follow the absolute word of it, implying its credibility to be absolute 0.  It's like going through a contract and thinking it's appropriate to only act on one of the items listed, even after signing it.

now if only he existed.
I don't believe anyone can accurately explain a transcendent being.  It's all point-of-view oriented.


Wasn't that your whole point of making this? :I

so another religion topic

how nice