No, there's a difference between believing in something that simply isn't true and showing blind faith. According to its own, flawed standards, what the bible states is an absolute possibility. Again, why did galileo know that the earth revolved around the sun before your God did? I'd think that our precious creator would know more about, you know, what he made, than the creations themselves.
It's not like God is compulsed to reveal every truth in the universe to his creation upfront rather than let them explore and manage the world.
Pretty sure nothing in the Bible suggests anything contrary to this.
There is one passage where Joshua tells the sun to stop moving, but that's because nobody knew otherwise at that time. I'm also pretty sure the edges of the earth referred to continent edges, in which oceans could not be easily sailed. You also have to take into consideration that Israelites used a lot of symbolism (especially apocalyptic) in descriptions of great objects.
the bible is total bullstuff currently, it's been translated and retold and retold so many times it's nothing to go by or let alone quote as truth
Well geez I'll go to these much more accurate original texts which we know for a fact exist since we can assert with full fact that the bible was translated and modified so many times that it had to be Beverly skewed in accordance to the original teachings.
>the fact that the bible states the world is only 6000 years old
You're not doing well.
Genesis 1:2 and 1:3 gap
