Facebook guy kills dogs for barking - ARGUMENTS

[Aces]

So Lalam if man has done nothing good for the earth and so why did explorers say that the North America was a land of forrests with skies filled with birds and had oceans of grass and an abundance of animals. The only humans to live there were the descendents of the Paleoindians or Native Americans. From what I've been told they were pretty smart. They were smart to never wipe out a food source or deforrest an entire area.

Because they were pretty low in demand for more luxurious things.

Then the white man came.

[Ad Bot]

[Wheatley]

Because they were pretty low in demand for more luxurious things.

Then the white man came.

loving white men
such whores

[DnaUnstable]

It is basic English to refer to something as 'IT' when you don't know it's gender, or it's gender neutral. I don't know the two dogs genders, so I refer to them as 'it'. So stop acting all superior "ANIMALS ARE PEOPLE TOO!" bullstuff because it is just how our language works.

[Blockzillahead]

Only a bear's instinct is to act as a predator, especially if they see you as a threat.  This guy did it for stuffs because he was annoyed with it barking at him.  There's a difference between natural instinct and sociopathic behavior.Aside from the obvious contradiction in your post, why don't you believe other animals don't deserve to live just as much as humans?  Are you that mu ch of an arrogant little cuntwad?"They're humans..."I would care if it were a mouse or a goat.  Don't immediately assume what you don't know, please.  And, haha, we're too sensitive because we don't share your same ideals on the life of other living things?  You're the absolute definition of stupid.Humans contribute negatively to the world, smartass.  We only benefit ourselves, not other species, and ESPECIALLY not to the planet.1. The kid lived where the dog had set out for new terretory, he caused no physical harm
2. "Property" in relation to human understanding and rights.  You've got to be 9 to assume that an animal can comprehend that you own land because you paid the same species for it.
3. See above.  On what grounds is a human's life more valuable?  Your own stupid standard based on narcissism and sociopathic behavior?

Finally someone with loving sense on these forums. I can't believe I got out-argued by a bunch of sociopaths.

[Aces]

loving white men
such whores

ikr

[Danny Boy]

And society continues its downwards spiral.

[Dezcaban]

i do not want 2 b doge

[Lalam24]

So Lalam if man has done nothing good for the earth and so why did explorers say that the North America was a land of forrests with skies filled with birds and had oceans of grass and an abundance of animals. The only humans to live there were the descendents of the Paleoindians or Native Americans. From what I've been told they were pretty smart. They were smart to never wipe out a food source or deforrest an entire area.

A stationary event in the past v. the common contributions we make today.  I was mistaken when I stated that we do not offer ANYTHING good for the planet, but the bad, without a doubt, outweighs the good, in this situation.

???
What arguments you talk about
There never was a discussion

Learn what an argument is, please.

[Destroyer]

Where are you getting these facts from?

I see nothing talking about properties, I also see nothing saying they were stray dogs? Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't see where these assumptions were coming from.

For all we know this guy could have been walking down the sidewalk, dogs could have barked at him everyday from their owners property, and he could have dragged them off the property and killed them.

I'm still waiting for an answer to this question.

[BlockoCrafter]

A good example of people taking the internet seriously.

[Awdax]

She doesnt have to decide it, its a fact. Were better. Why are you trying to make it out as if animals are saints and live their life as if it was a disney cartoon? They kill just as much as we do, and torture? Have you ever seen animal planet, where the lioness will pounce on a gazelle and then her and her family will eat it from the ass to the head? Do you think it dies when they bite its ass or something? Is that not considered torture to you? Also rape, Im not even going to go into detail with that one because its pretty commonsense that animals rape other animals. We ARE this amazing species, and its our brains that make us this amazing species so of course if we didnt have such amazing brains we wouldve been extinct, thats common sense - But news flash, we do have amazing brains and so that point its useless.

I used to have this one-year old cat that would rape my seven-year old cat.

The one-year old was a bit bigger since he was a bit fat, but faster because he was full of energy. They would get into little play fights, which would soon escalate quickly. The younger cat would then chase around the other until he got on top of him, bit the back of his neck - restraining him, then begin to furiously hump the stuff out of the older cat. Oh yeah, they were both males too.

It was funny in a way, but at the same time just plain wrong - and I would have to stop them, or him. Whatever.

[Lalam24]

She doesnt have to decide it, its a fact. Were better. Why are you trying to make it out as if animals are saints and live their life as if it was a disney cartoon? They kill just as much as we do, and torture? Have you ever seen animal planet, where the lioness will pounce on a gazelle and then her and her family will eat it from the ass to the head? Do you think it dies when they bite its ass or something? Is that not considered torture to you? Also rape, Im not even going to go into detail with that one because its pretty commonsense that animals rape other animals. We ARE this amazing species, and its our brains that make us this amazing species so of course if we didnt have such amazing brains we wouldve been extinct, thats common sense - But news flash, we do have amazing brains and so that point its useless.

Stop comparing natural instinct to sociopathic behavior.  This is the promotion of a mental illness, not a social standard.

Yes, we have superior intellect, because of an evolutionary standard that went a bit too far.  That doesn't mean we're more important, it simple means we can promote more intellect.  And, in turn, if we're intelligent enough, we should be aware of the fact that all life contributes in its own way.

[Night Fox]

He killed a dog because the dog was stupid and barked at something bigger. If i go and forget with a bear the bear will claw my face off; small dogs are bred to have no fear of larger animals, the fact that someone killed a small dog because it was pissing with them comes as no surprise.

bears don't have empathy or compassion for other things. we do
would you agree with killing a small child because he was yelling at you? no, you wouldn't

[Qwepir]

would you agree with killing a small child because he was yelling at you? no, you wouldn't

the difference being that i wouldnt kill a small child because they are a fellow member of my species

[Dusty12]

And who the forget are you to decide this?
Since when were we so much better than animals?
Last time I checked, animals weren't starting massive wars, torturing people, raping, etc.

Stop acting like we're this amazing species that's better than everything else.
If it weren't for our brains we'd be extinct thousands of years ago.

But we are better than everything else. It amuses me that people would actually value the life of a small kitten over an actual human being with more complex thoughts and feelings. It sure is easy for you to focus on wars and murders and torturing people but humanity has done more good than it has bad. We've invented that computer you're using, which has revolutionized the entire world. We've also invented the medicine that was used to vaccinate you as a child and save your life, so that's another one. Lassie didn't do that. And animals don't start wars because they are stupid and do not understand the concept of 'war' or what causes war - moral issues, territorial issues, bad diplomacy. Animals don't deal with any of these things because they don't have the same level of intelligence that humans do. This doesn't mean that they're unimportant or useless, it simply means that a human life is infinitely more valuable.

Other animals don't show the same level of intelligence or sentience that humans do. They can't understand property laws, or language, or emotions, or pain, or anything of the sort. Were it to come down to me having to choose between killing a dog or a person, it would always be the dog simply because human life is far more important. Dogs and cats don't advance medicine with research. Birds and lizards don't create machines, or work in factories, or keep the public safe. They don't have friends or families that will mourn their death and have it scar them emotionally. A human life is just more valuable. We are infinitely more intelligent.